Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 20

APPLICATION for attorney Beth A. Landes to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-12457507 paid.) filed by plaintiff Rupa Marya. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Manifold, Betsy)

Download PDF
_________________________________________________________________________________ Name and address: Beth A. Landes Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 270 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RUPA MARYA, et at CASE NUMBER CV-13-04460-GHK (MRWx) Plaintiff(s) WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC, Defendant(s). APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS Complete Section 1 of this Application, sign the certUication in Section II, and have your designated Local Counsel sign in Section 111; note that electronic signatures are not accepted. Space to supplement your responses is provided in Section IV. Attach a Certificate of Good Standing (issued within the last 30 days)from every state bar to which you are admitted. Scan the completed and signed Application, with attachment(s), to a single Portable Document Format (PDF)file. (2) Have your Local Counsel ejile your Application, using the Court’s CM/ECF System, and submit a Proposed Order (using Form G-64 ORDER, available from the Court’s website). (3) Submit payment in the amount of $325 for each case in which you file an Application. Payment may be submitted at the time of c-filing through, or by delivering payment to the Clerk’s Office (Attn: Fiscal) with a copy of the c-filed Application. Ifyour payment is not received within 5 days of the filing ofyour Application, your Application may be rejected. You will not be allowed to participate as an attorney of record in this case until your payment is received. SECTION I INFORMATION (1) - - Landes, Beth A. Applicant’s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial) Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP Firm Name 270 Madison Avenue 212-545-4653 212-545-4600 Telephone Number Street Address New York, NY 10016 City, State, Zip Code Fax Number E-Mail Address I have been retained to represent the following parties: Robert Siegel 15 Plaintiff F Defendant Rupa Marya f Plaintiff F Defendant F F Other: Other: Name(s) of Party(ies) Represented List all courts to which you have been admitted and the current status of your membership: Date ofAdmission Active Member in Good Standing? (if not, please explain) State of New York 1/20/2011 Yes Southern District of New York 6/7/2011 Yes Second Circuit 11/2/2011 Yes G-64 (06/13) APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE Page 1 o13 List all cases in which you have applied to this Court for pro hac vice status in the previous three years: C’ase Number Title of Action Date of Application Granted/ Denied? If any pro hac vice applications submitted within the past three (3) years have been denied by the Court, please explain: Have you previously registered as a CM/ECF user in the Central District of California? If yes, was your CM/ECF User account associated with the e-mail address provided above? r Yes F Yes 15? No F No: Previous E-Mail Used (if applicable) You must be registered for the Court’s Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (“CM/ECF”) System to be admitted to practice pro hac vice in this Court. Submission of this Application will constitute your registration (or re-registration) as a CM/ECF User. If the Court signs an Order granting your Application, you will either be issued a new CM/ECF login and password, or the existing account you identified above will be associated with your case. Pursuant to Local Rule 5-3.2.2, registering as a CM/ECF User is deemed consent,for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E), to electronic service of documents through the ‘M/ECF System. You have the right to withhold or revoke your consent to electronic service at any time; simply complete and return a Central District Electronic Service Exemption Form (Form G-05, available from the Court’s website). If the Court receives an Electronic Service Exemption Form from you, you will no longer receive notice by e-mail when Court orders or other documents are filed in cases in which you are counsel of record; instead, copies of such documents will be sent to you through the mail. SECTION II- CERTIFICATION I declare under penalty of perjury that: (1) All of the above information is true and correct. (2) I am not a resident of the State of California. I am not regularly employed in, or engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. (3) I am not currently suspended from and have never been disbarred from practice in any court. (4) I am familiar with the Court’s Local Civil and Criminal Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure, and the Federal Rules of Evidence. (5) 1 designate the attorney listed in Section III below, who is a member in good standing of the Bar of this Court and maintains an office in the Central District of California for the practice of law, as local counsel pursuant to Local Rule 83- Dated 07/10/i 3 Beth A. Landes Applicant’s Name (lease type or print) A G-64 (06/13) frd ci i 4 St 47 icants bignature APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE Page 2 of 3 SECTION III DESIGNATION OF LOCAL COUNSEL - Manifold, Betsy C. Designee’s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle InitiaI Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP Firm Name 619-234-4599 619-239-4599 Symphony Towers Telephone Number 750 B Street, Suite 2770 Street Address E-lvlait Address San Diego, CA, 92101 182450 City, State, Zip Code Designee’s California State Bar Number Fax Number I hereby consent to the foregoing designation as local counsel. Dated Betsy C. Manifold Designee’s Name (please type or print) 2 Designee’s Sigture (1 A Li SECTION IV SUPPLEMENT ANSWERS HERE (ATTACH ADI5iTIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY1 - G-64 (06/13) APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?