Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 221

Joint STIPULATION to Continue Hearing Date from July 7, 2015 to July 14, 2015 Re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, 220 filed by defendants Summy-Birchard Inc, Warner Chappell Music Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Klaus, Kelly)

GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 112503)
1 [e-mail]
KELLY M. KLAUS (State Bar No. 161091)
2 [e-mail]
3 MELINDA E. LeMOINE (State Bar No. 235670)
[e-mail]
4 ADAM I. KAPLAN (State Bar No. 268182)
[e-mail]
5 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue
6 Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
7 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
8
Attorneys for Defendants Warner/Chappell
9 Music, Inc. and
Summy-Birchard, Inc.
10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION

13
14

GOOD MORNING TO YOU
15 PRODUCTIONS CORP.; et al.,

Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK
(MRWx)

16

JOINT STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE
SET BY DKT. NO. 220; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION

Plaintiffs,

17 v.
18 WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.,
19 et al.,
20

Defendants.
Judge:

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Courtroom:

Hon. George H. King,
Chief Judge
650

1

WHEREAS, on June 18, 2015, the Court ordered that the parties attend oral

2 argument on the Parties’ Joint Supplemental Brief on Tuesday, July 7, 2015 at 9:30
3 A.M. (Dkt. No. 220);
4
WHEREAS, on the morning of July 7, 2015, Defendants’ lead counsel is
5 scheduled to argue an appeal in Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., et al.,
6 13-16106, before the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco;
7
WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred in good faith and agreed that a one8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

week continuance of the hearing date would be appropriate to accommodate
Defendants’ counsel’s scheduling conflict;
WHEREAS, a one-week continuance of the hearing date would not alter any
other deadlines set by the Court in this matter;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by
and between the parties, through the undersigned counsel, as follows: Upon the
Court’s approval, the oral argument ordered by Dkt. No. 220 shall be held on
Tuesday, July 14, 2015 at 9:30 A.M.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

17
18

Respectfully submitted,

19
20

Dated: June 24, 2015

MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON LLP

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By:

/s/ KELLY M. KLAUS
KELLY M. KLAUS
KELLY M. KLAUS
[e-mail]
ADAM I. KAPLAN
[e-mail]
560 Mission St., 27th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105

-1-

1

Telephone: [phone]

2

GLEN POMERANTZ
[e-mail]
MELINDA E. LeMOINE
[e-mail]
MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Ave., 35th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213/687-3702

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants Warner/Chappell
Music, Inc. and Summy-Birchard, Inc.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 24, 2015

WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER
FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
By: /s/ BETSY C. MANIFOLD
BETSY C. MANIFOLD
FRANCIS M. GREGOREK
[e-mail]
BETSY C. MANIFOLD
[e-mail]
RACHELE R. RICKERT
[e-mail]
MARISA C. LIVESAY
[e-mail]
750 B Street, Suite 2770
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 619/234-4599
WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER
FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
MARK C. RIFKIN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JANINE POLLACK (pro hac vice)

-2-

1
2
3
4
5
6

[e-mail]
BETH A. LANDES (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
270 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212-545-4753
Interim Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

RANDALL S. NEWMAN PC
RANDALL S. NEWMAN (190547)
[e-mail]
37 Wall Street, Penthouse D
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
HUNT ORTMANN PALFFY NIEVES
DARLING & MAH, INC.
ALISON C. GIBBS (257526)
[e-mail]
OMEL A. NIEVES (134444)
[e-mail]
KATHLYNN E. SMITH (234541)
[e-mail]
301 North Lake Avenue, 7th Floor
Pasadena, CA 91101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 626/796-0107
DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP
WILLIAM R. HILL (114954)
[e-mail]
ANDREW S. MACKAY (197074)
[e-mail]
DANIEL J. SCHACHT (259717)
[e-mail]
1999 Harrison Street, 25th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612-3520

-3-

Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 510/832-1486

1
2

GLANCY BINKOW &
GOLDBERG LLP
LIONEL Z. GLANCY (134180)
[e-mail]
MARC L. GODINO (188669)
[e-mail]
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310/201-9160

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11
12

DECLARATION REGARDING CONCURRENCE

13

I, Kelly M. Klaus, am the ECF User whose identification and password are

14

being used to file this JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING

15

DATE SET BY DKT. NO. 220; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

16

STIPULATION. In compliance with L.R. 5-4.3.4, I hereby attest that I hereby

17

attest that Betsy C. Manifold has concurred in this filing’s content and has authorized

18

its filing.

19
20

Dated: June 24, 2015

By: /s/ KELLY M. KLAUS
KELLY M. KLAUS

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-4-

DECLARATION OF KELLY M. KLAUS

1
2

1.

I, Kelly M. Klaus, hereby declare as follows:

3

2.

I am a member of the firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, counsel for

4

Defendants in the above-captioned action. I am admitted to practice law in the State

5

of California and before this Court. I submit this declaration in support of the

6

parties’ Joint Stipulation to Continue the Hearing Date Set by Dkt. No. 220. I have

7

personal knowledge of the facts stated herein. If called upon to testify to the facts as

8

to which I have person knowledge, I could, and would, competently do so.
3.

9

On June 18, 2015, the Court ordered that the parties attend oral

10

argument on the Parties’ Joint Supplemental Brief on Tuesday, July 7, 2015 at 9:30

11

A.M. (Dkt. No. 220).

12

4.

On the morning of July 7, 2015, I am scheduled to argue an appeal in

13

Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., et al., 13-16106, before the Ninth Circuit

14

in San Francisco.

15

5.

This hearing date was set by the Ninth Circuit on April 27, 2015.

16

6.

I met and conferred with Plaintiffs’ counsel regarding the hearing date

17

set by the Court on June 18, 2015 (Dkt. No. 220), and that Plaintiffs’ counsel agreed

18

that a one-week continuance of the hearing date would be appropriate in light of my

19

scheduling conflicts.

20
21

7.

A one-week continuance of the briefing deadline and hearing date

would not alter any other deadlines set by the Court in this matter

22

8.

For the foregoing reasons, the parties have shown good cause for a one-

23

week continuance of the hearing date set by the Court on June 18, 2015 (Dkt. No.

24

220).

25

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

26

Executed this 24th day of June 2015, San Francisco, C.A.

27
28

/s/ KELLY M. KLAUS
KELLY M. KLAUS

-5-