Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 247

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,, Order on Motion for Leave,,, Order on Motion for Consideration,,,,, 244 filed by Defendants Summy-Birchard Inc, Warner Chappell Music Inc. Motion set for hearing on 11/16/2015 at 09:30 AM before Judge George H. King. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Defendants Motion 1 For Reconsideration Of Courts Memorandum And Order Re Cross-Motions For Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 244) Or, Alternatively, 2 To Certify Order For Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)) (Klaus, Kelly)

1 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 112503)
[e-mail]
2 KELLY M. KLAUS (State Bar No. 161091)
[e-mail]
3 MELINDA E. LeMOINE (State Bar No. 235670)
[e-mail]
4 ADAM I. KAPLAN (State Bar No. 268182)
[e-mail]
5 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue
6 Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
7 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
8
Attorneys for Defendants
9 Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. and
Summy-Birchard, Inc.
10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION

13 GOOD MORNING TO YOU
PRODUCTIONS CORP.; et al.,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
v.
16
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.,
17 et al.,
18
19

Defendants.

Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK
(MRWx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION [1] FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF
COURT’S MEMORANDUM AND
ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(DKT. NO. 244) OR,
ALTERNATIVELY, [2] TO
CERTIFY ORDER FOR
INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)

20
21
22
23

Date:
November 16, 2015
Time:
9:30 a.m.
Courtroom: 650
Judge:
Hon. George H. King,
Chief Judge

24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOT. FOR
RECONSIDERATION OR CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK (MRWx)

1

After considering all of the arguments and briefing presented by the parties in

2 connection with Defendants’ Motion [1] for Reconsideration of Court’s
3 Memorandum and Order Re Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 244)
4 (the “Order”) Or, Alternatively, [2] to Certify Order for Interlocutory Appeal Under
5 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Motion as follows.
6

[ALTERNATIVE 1:

7

Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration is Granted. The Court reconsiders

8 the Order and rules that [Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED
9 and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED] OR [the Parties’
10 Motions for Summary Judgment are both DENIED].]
11

[ALTERNATIVE 2:

12

In accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 5(a)(3), the Court hereby amends the

13 Order to add the following paragraph at page 43, line 5:
14

“The Court finds that this Order involves controlling questions of law

15

as to which there are substantial grounds for differences of opinion, and

16

that an immediate appeal from the Order may materially advance the

17

ultimate termination of this litigation. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).”]

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ________

________________________________________
THE HONORABLE GEORGE H. KING
CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

25
26
27
28
-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOT. FOR
RECONSIDERATION OR CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK (MRWx)

1 Respectfully submitted by:
2
3 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
4
5

By:

/s/ Kelly M. Klaus
KELLY M. KLAUS

6 Attorneys for Defendants Warner/Chappell
7 Music, Inc. and Summy-Birchard, Inc.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOT. FOR
RECONSIDERATION OR CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK (MRWx)