Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 264

OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND Amended Complaint, 95 Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to Amend and File Fifth Amended Complaint 258 /Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Summy-Birchard Inc, Warner Chappell Music Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 3 Exhibit 2 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 4 Exhibit 3 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 5 Exhibit 4 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 6 Exhibit 5 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 7 Exhibit 6 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 8 Exhibit 7 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 9 Exhibit 8 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 10 Exhibit 9 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 11 Exhibit 10 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 12 Exhibit 11 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint)(Klaus, Kelly)

Download PDF
Exhibit 4 Ex. 4 31 Home Search Browse Submit Subscribe Shopping Cart MyBriefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Organizations SSRN Blog Feedback to SSRN     Abstract http://ssrn.com/abstract=1111624 Paper statistics   Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser Abstract Views: Downloads: | Share | Email | Add to MyBriefcase | Purchase Bound Hard Copy Download Rank: Copyright and the World's Most Popular Song 89,222 9,485 262 People who downloaded this paper also downloaded: 1. iTunes: How Copyright, Contract, and Technology Shape the Business of Digital Media - A Case Study By Urs Gasser Robert Brauneis George Washington University - Law School October 14, 2010 56 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 335 (2009) GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 392 Paper comments Abstract:      "Happy Birthday to You" is the best-known and most frequently sung song in the world. Many - including Justice Breyer in his dissent in Eldred v. Ashcroft - have portrayed it as an unoriginal work that is hardly worthy of copyright protection, but nonetheless remains under copyright. Yet close historical scrutiny reveals both of those assumptions to be false. The song that became "Happy Birthday to You," originally written with different lyrics as "Good Morning to All," was the product of intense creative labor, undertaken with copyright protection in mind. However, it is almost certainly no longer under copyright, due to a lack of evidence about who wrote the words; defective copyright notice; and a failure to file a proper renewal application. The falsity of the standard story about the song demonstrates the dangers of relying on anecdotes without thorough research and analysis. It also reveals collective action barriers to mounting challenges to copyright validity: the song generates an estimated $2 million per year, and yet no one has ever sought adjudication of the validity of its copyright. Finally, the true story of the song demonstrates that a long, unitary copyright term requires changes in copyright doctrine and administration. With such a term, copyright law needs a doctrine like adverse possession to clear title and protect expectations generated when, as with this song, putative owners do not challenge distribution of unauthorized copies for more than 20 years. And Copyright Office recordkeeping policy, which currently calls for discarding correspondence after 20 years and most registration denials and deposits after five years, must be improved to facilitate resolution of disputes involving older works. Over two hundred unpublished documents found in six archives across the United States have been made available on a website that will serve as an online appendix to this article. Number of Pages in PDF File: 69 Keywords: Copyright, Copyright Notice, Copyright Renewal, Authorship, Collective Action, Copyright Office, Anecdotes, Happy Birthday to You, Prescription, Adverse Possession, Copyright History No comments have been made on this paper Add Comment > Start Download Now Convert Videos to Any Format W/ The Free Video Download Converter! JEL Classification: K19, K20 Date posted: March 21, 2008 ; Last revised: July 5, 2013 Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser videodownloadconverter.com Suggested Citation Brauneis, Robert, Copyright and the World's Most Popular Song (October 14, 2010). 56 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 335 (2009) ; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 392. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1111624 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1111624 Contact Information Robert Brauneis (Contact Author) George Washington University - Law School ( email ) 2000 H Street, N.W. Ex. 4 32 Washington, DC 20052 United States © 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.422 seconds and delivered in 2.323 seconds Ex. 4 33

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?