Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc
Filing
264
OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND Amended Complaint, 95 Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to Amend and File Fifth Amended Complaint 258 /Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Summy-Birchard Inc, Warner Chappell Music Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 3 Exhibit 2 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 4 Exhibit 3 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 5 Exhibit 4 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 6 Exhibit 5 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 7 Exhibit 6 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 8 Exhibit 7 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 9 Exhibit 8 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 10 Exhibit 9 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 11 Exhibit 10 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint, # 12 Exhibit 11 to Declaration Of Kelly M. Klaus ISO Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Amend And File Fifth Amended Complaint)(Klaus, Kelly)
Exhibit 4
Ex. 4
31
Home
Search
Browse
Submit
Subscribe
Shopping Cart
MyBriefcase
Top Papers
Top Authors
Top Organizations
SSRN Blog
Feedback to SSRN
Abstract
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1111624
Paper statistics
Download This Paper
Open PDF in Browser
Abstract Views:
Downloads:
| Share | Email | Add to MyBriefcase | Purchase Bound Hard Copy
Download Rank:
Copyright and the World's Most Popular Song
89,222
9,485
262
People who downloaded this
paper also downloaded:
1. iTunes: How Copyright,
Contract, and Technology
Shape the Business of Digital
Media - A Case Study
By Urs Gasser
Robert Brauneis
George Washington University - Law School
October 14, 2010
56 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 335 (2009)
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 392
Paper comments
Abstract:
"Happy Birthday to You" is the best-known and most frequently sung song in the world. Many - including Justice
Breyer in his dissent in Eldred v. Ashcroft - have portrayed it as an unoriginal work that is hardly worthy of
copyright protection, but nonetheless remains under copyright. Yet close historical scrutiny reveals both of those
assumptions to be false. The song that became "Happy Birthday to You," originally written with different lyrics as
"Good Morning to All," was the product of intense creative labor, undertaken with copyright protection in mind.
However, it is almost certainly no longer under copyright, due to a lack of evidence about who wrote the words;
defective copyright notice; and a failure to file a proper renewal application.
The falsity of the standard story about the song demonstrates the dangers of relying on anecdotes without
thorough research and analysis. It also reveals collective action barriers to mounting challenges to copyright
validity: the song generates an estimated $2 million per year, and yet no one has ever sought adjudication of the
validity of its copyright. Finally, the true story of the song demonstrates that a long, unitary copyright term
requires changes in copyright doctrine and administration. With such a term, copyright law needs a doctrine like
adverse possession to clear title and protect expectations generated when, as with this song, putative owners do
not challenge distribution of unauthorized copies for more than 20 years. And Copyright Office recordkeeping
policy, which currently calls for discarding correspondence after 20 years and most registration denials and
deposits after five years, must be improved to facilitate resolution of disputes involving older works.
Over two hundred unpublished documents found in six archives across the United States have been made
available on a website that will serve as an online appendix to this article.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 69
Keywords: Copyright, Copyright Notice, Copyright Renewal, Authorship, Collective Action, Copyright Office,
Anecdotes, Happy Birthday to You, Prescription, Adverse Possession, Copyright History
No comments have been made
on this paper
Add Comment >
Start
Download
Now
Convert
Videos to Any
Format W/ The
Free Video
Download
Converter!
JEL Classification: K19, K20
Date posted: March 21, 2008 ; Last revised: July 5, 2013
Download This Paper
Open PDF in Browser
videodownloadconverter.com
Suggested Citation
Brauneis, Robert, Copyright and the World's Most Popular Song (October 14, 2010). 56 Journal of the
Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 335 (2009) ; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 392. Available at
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1111624 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1111624
Contact Information
Robert Brauneis (Contact Author)
George Washington University - Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Ex. 4
32
Washington, DC 20052
United States
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. FAQ Terms of Use Privacy Policy Copyright Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.422 seconds and delivered in 2.323 seconds
Ex. 4
33
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?