Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 35

APPLICATION for attorney Mark C. Rifkin to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-12559541 paid.) filed by plaintiffs Good Morning to You Productions Corp, Rupa Marya, Robert Siegel. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Odenbreit, Katherine)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NUMBER: CV 13-04460 GHK (MRWx) RUPA MARYA, et al., Plaintiff(s) v. WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., Defendant(s). (PROPOSED) ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE The Court, having reviewed proof of payment of the applicable fee and accompanying Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice filed by of Rifkin, Mark C. Applicant=s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial) 212-545-4600 212-545-4653 Telephone Number Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 270 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10016 Fax Number rifkin@whafh.com E-Mail Address Firm Name & Address for permission to appear and participate in this case on behalf of Rupa Mayra, Robert Siegel, and Good Morning To You Productions Corp. XX Plaintiffs Name(s) of Party(ies) Represented Defendant Other: and designating as Local Counsel Odenbreit, Katherine J. Designee’s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial) 184619 Designee’s Cal. Bar Number 626/440-5200 Telephone Number 626/796-0107 Fax Number of HUNT ORTMANN PALFFY NIEVES DARLING & MAH, INC. 301 North Lake Avenue, 7th Floor Pasadena, CA 9110 Firm Name & Address odenbreit@huntortmann.com hereby ORDERS the Application be: E-Mail Address __ GRANTED. __ DENIED. Fee shall be returned by the Clerk. __ DENIED. For failure to pay the required fee. Dated GB64 ORDER (06/13) U.S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge (PROPOSED) ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?