Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc
Filing
35
APPLICATION for attorney Mark C. Rifkin to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-12559541 paid.) filed by plaintiffs Good Morning to You Productions Corp, Rupa Marya, Robert Siegel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Odenbreit, Katherine)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NUMBER: CV 13-04460 GHK (MRWx)
RUPA MARYA, et al.,
Plaintiff(s)
v.
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.,
Defendant(s).
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON APPLICATION
OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR
IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE
The Court, having reviewed proof of payment of the applicable fee and accompanying Application of
Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice filed by
of
Rifkin, Mark C.
Applicant=s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial)
212-545-4600
212-545-4653
Telephone Number
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP
270 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
Fax Number
rifkin@whafh.com
E-Mail Address
Firm Name & Address
for permission to appear and participate in this case on behalf of
Rupa Mayra, Robert Siegel, and Good Morning To You Productions Corp.
XX Plaintiffs
Name(s) of Party(ies) Represented
Defendant
Other:
and designating as Local Counsel
Odenbreit, Katherine J.
Designee’s Name (Last Name, First Name & Middle Initial)
184619
Designee’s Cal. Bar Number
626/440-5200
Telephone Number
626/796-0107
Fax Number
of
HUNT ORTMANN PALFFY NIEVES
DARLING & MAH, INC.
301 North Lake Avenue, 7th Floor
Pasadena, CA 9110
Firm Name & Address
odenbreit@huntortmann.com
hereby ORDERS the Application be:
E-Mail Address
__ GRANTED.
__ DENIED. Fee shall be returned by the Clerk.
__ DENIED. For failure to pay the required fee.
Dated
GB64 ORDER (06/13)
U.S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?