Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc
Filing
368
NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendants Summy-Birchard Inc, Warner Chappell Music Inc. correcting Sealed Document, 366 , APPLICATION to file document Defendants' Application To File Unredacted Reply Brief Regarding Response To Class Counsel's Billing Records Under Seal under seal 365 (Klaus, Kelly)
1 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 112503)
glenn.pomerantz@mto.com
2
KELLY M. KLAUS (State Bar No. 161091)
3 kelly.klaus@mto.com
ADAM I. KAPLAN (State Bar No. 268182)
4
adam.kaplan@mto.com
5 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue
6
Thirty-Fifth Floor
7 Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
Telephone: (213) 683-9100
8
Facsimile: (213) 687-3702
9
10 Attorneys for Defendants
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. and
11 Summy-Birchard, Inc.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
14
GOOD MORNING TO YOU
15 PRODUCTIONS CORP.; et al.,
16
Plaintiffs,
17
18 v.
Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK
(MRWx)
DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF
ERRATA REGARDING DKT NOS.
365-2 AND 366
19 WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.,
20 et al.,
21
Defendants.
Courtroom: 650
Judge:
Hon. George H. King,
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF ERRATA
CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK
1
Defendants’ respectfully submit the following errata to correct a sentence in
2 their Reply Brief Regarding Response to Class Counsel’s Billing Records (Dkt. No.
3 366 (Unredacted) and 365-2 (Redacted)).
4
The sentence on page 3, lines 2-4, states:
5
< The court in Perfect 10 did accept a long entry—the one that Class Counsel
6 block quote, at pp. 7-8—that did not identify the amount of time for specific tasks.>
7
The sentence should instead read:
8
13
14 DATED: July 21, 2016
15
Respectfully submitted,
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
16
17
18
19
20
By:
/s/ Kelly M. Klaus
KELLY M. KLAUS
Attorneys for Defendants Warner/Chappell
Music, Inc. and Summy-Birchard, Inc.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
NOTICE OF ERRATA
CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?