Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc
Filing
54
NOTICE OF LODGING filed re MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint and/or Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Proposed Class Definition #52 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Klaus, Kelly)
1 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 112503)
glenn. pomerantz@mto.com
2 KELLY M. KLAUS (State Bar No. 161091)
3 kelly.klaus@mto.com
ADAM I. KAPLAN (State Bar No. 268182)
4 adam.kaplan@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
5 355 South Grand Avenue
Thirty-Fifth Floor
6 Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
7 Telephone: (213) 683-9100
Facsimile: (213) 687-3702
8
Attorneys for Defendants
9 Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. and
Summy-Birchard, Inc.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
13 RUPAMARYA,etal.
14
15
16
17
Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK
(MRWx)
Plaintiffs,
v.
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.,
Defendant.
18
NOTICE OF LODGING
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO
DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT
Date:
September 30, 2013
Time:
9:30a.m.
20
Courtroom: 650 (Roybal)
21 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Judge: Hon. George H. King, Chief Judge
MAJAR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, On
22 Behalf of Itself and All Others
Similarly Situated,
23
Case No. CV 13-05164-GJK (MRWx)
Plaintiff,
24
19
25 v.
26 WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.,
27 and SUMMY-BIRCHARD, INC.,
Defendants.
28
21577041.1
NOTICE OF LODGING
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Warner/Chappell Music, Inc.
2 and Summy-Birchard, Inc. hereby lodge with the Court:
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO
4 DISMISS SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION
5 COMPLAINT.
6
7
8 DATED: August 30,2013
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
9
10
By:
11
Is/ Kelly M Klaus
KELLY M. KLAUS
12
Attorneys for Defendants Warner/Chappell
Music, Inc. and Summy-Birchard, Inc.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
21577041 .1
-1-
NOTICE OF LODGING
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?