Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 54

NOTICE OF LODGING filed re MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint and/or Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Proposed Class Definition 52 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Klaus, Kelly)

Download PDF
1 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 112503) glenn. pomerantz@mto.com 2 KELLY M. KLAUS (State Bar No. 161091) 3 kelly.klaus@mto.com ADAM I. KAPLAN (State Bar No. 268182) 4 adam.kaplan@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 5 355 South Grand Avenue Thirty-Fifth Floor 6 Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 7 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 8 Attorneys for Defendants 9 Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. and Summy-Birchard, Inc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 13 RUPAMARYA,etal. 14 15 16 17 Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK (MRWx) Plaintiffs, v. WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., Defendant. 18 NOTICE OF LODGING [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Date: September 30, 2013 Time: 9:30a.m. 20 Courtroom: 650 (Roybal) 21 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Judge: Hon. George H. King, Chief Judge MAJAR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, On 22 Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, 23 Case No. CV 13-05164-GJK (MRWx) Plaintiff, 24 19 25 v. 26 WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., 27 and SUMMY-BIRCHARD, INC., Defendants. 28 21577041.1 NOTICE OF LODGING [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. 2 and Summy-Birchard, Inc. hereby lodge with the Court: 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO 4 DISMISS SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 5 COMPLAINT. 6 7 8 DATED: August 30,2013 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 9 10 By: 11 Is/ Kelly M Klaus KELLY M. KLAUS 12 Attorneys for Defendants Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. and Summy-Birchard, Inc. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 21577041 .1 -1- NOTICE OF LODGING [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?