Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 54

NOTICE OF LODGING filed re MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint and/or Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Proposed Class Definition 52 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Klaus, Kelly)

Download PDF
9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 12 RUPA MARYA, eta!. 13 Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK (MRWx) Plaintiffs, [PROPOSEDl ORDER GRANTING DEFENDAN1'S'MOTIONTO ' DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 15 WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Defendant. 16 14 v. Dfite: September 30, 2013 Ttme: 9:30a.m. Courtroom: 650 (Roybal} Judge: Hon. George H. King, Chief Judge 17 18 19 20 21 MAJARPRODUCTIONS LLC, On Behalf of Itself and All Others 22 Similarly Situated, 23 Plaintiff, Case No. CV 13-05164-GJK (MR.Wx) 24 v. 25 WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., and SillviMY-BIRCHARD, INC., 26 Defendants. 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING . WARNER/CHAPPELL'S MOTION TO DISMISS 1 After considering all of the arguments and briefing presented by the parties in 2 connection with Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Consolidated 3 Class Action Complaint and/or Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Proposed Class 4 Definition, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' Motion. 1. 5 Plaintiffs' third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh claims for relief in 6 Plaintiffs' Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint are dismissed 7 with prejudice. 8 2. Plaintiffs Majar Productions, LLC and Robert Siegel, and their 9 complaints, are dismissed with prejudice. 10 3. Plaintiffs' proposed class definition is dismissed with prejudice [or 11 stricken] to the extent that it exceeds three years prior to the first of the complaints 12 filed in these cases. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 DATED: _ __ THE HONORABLE GEORGE H. KING 16 CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 18 19 Respectfully submitted by: 20 21 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 22 23 By: Is/ Kelly M Klaus KELLY M. KLAUS 24 Attorneys for Defendants Warner/Chappell 25 Music. Inc. and Summv-Birchard. Inc. 26 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WARNER/CHAPPELL' S MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?