Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 92

MINUTES OF (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER ENTERING SCHEDULING DATES: Scheduling Conference held before Judge George H. King. After discussion with counsel, Court agrees to defer consideration of the statute of limitations defenses and class certification at this time. We now set the followingscheduling dates leading to the anticipated cross-motions for summary judgment in this phase one of this action only. If the summary judgment motions do not dispose of this first phase of this action, we will set further scheduling dates as needed. Any stipulation or motion to amend as to any claims, defenses and/or parties shall be lodged/filed by no later than April 24, 2014, failing which it shall be deemed that partys waiver of any such amendments in this action. All fact discovery shall be COMPLETED by no later than June 27, 2014. The parties shall designate their expert witnesses, and make the required disclosures, by no later than July 25, 2014, and do likewise for any rebuttal expert witnesses by no later than August 25, 2014. All expert discovery shall be COMPLETED by no later than September 26, 2014. By no later than September 26, 2014, counsel shall file a joint status report setting forth their views onwhether a settlement conference before summary judgment motions would be fruitful. Any motion for summary judgment shall be filed in compliance with the Local Rules, as well as our Order Re: Summary Judgment Motions issued concurrently herewith, by no later than November 14, 2014. (See order for further details).Court Reporter: N/A. (shb)

Download PDF
E-FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 13-4460-GHK(MRWx) Title GOOD MORNING TO YOU PRODUCTIONS CORPORATION, et al. vs. WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., et al. Presiding: The Honorable Date MARCH 24, 2014 GEORGE H. KING, CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE Beatrice Herrera N/A N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: BETSY C. MANIFOLD KELLY M. KLAUS ADAM I. KAPLAN Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER ENTERING SCHEDULING DATES Court conducts scheduling conference with counsel. After discussion with counsel, Court agrees to defer consideration of the statute of limitations defenses and class certification at this time. We now set the following scheduling dates leading to the anticipated cross-motions for summary judgment in this phase one of this action only. If the summary judgment motions do not dispose of this first phase of this action, we will set further scheduling dates as needed. 1. Any stipulation or motion to amend as to any claims, defenses and/or parties shall be lodged/filed by no later than April 24, 2014, failing which it shall be deemed that party’s waiver of any such amendments in this action. 2. All fact discovery shall be COMPLETED by no later than June 27, 2014. Completion means that any discovery that is not received in hand by the requesting party by the completion date will be denied. If any discovery motions are necessary, the parties shall ensure that they are calendared and heard by the magistrate judge sufficiently in advance of the completion date to permit actual production, by the completion date, of any discovery the judge might order. 3. The parties shall designate their expert witnesses, and make the required disclosures, by no later than July 25, 2014, and do likewise for any rebuttal expert witnesses by no later than August 25, 2014. 4. All expert discovery shall be COMPLETED by no later than September 26, 2014. 5. By no later than September 26, 2014, counsel shall file a joint status report setting forth their views on whether a settlement conference before summary judgment motions would be fruitful. 6. Any motion for summary judgment shall be filed in compliance with the Local Rules, as well as our Order Re: Summary Judgment Motions issued concurrently herewith, by no later than November 14, 2014, and noticed for hearing thereafter regularly under the Local Rules. Any untimely or non-conforming motion will be CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 2 E-FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 13-4460-GHK(MRWx) Date MARCH 24, 2014 Title GOOD MORNING TO YOU PRODUCTIONS CORPORATION, et al. vs. WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., et al. denied. 7. Failure by any party and/or counsel to strictly comply with the Federal and Local Rules, as well as our Orders, will result in the imposition of an appropriate sanction against the offending party/counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. : Initials of Preparer CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL 49 Bea Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?