Standard Fabrics International Inc v. Forever 21 Retail Inc et al

Filing 35

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION by Judge Percy Anderson: Upon Stipulation 34 , IT IS ORDERED that this Action is dismissed with prejudice. This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement agreement that gave rise to this dismissal. The parties will each bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Stephen M. Doniger (SBN 179314) stephen@donigerlawfirm.com Scott A. Burroughs (SBN 235718) scott@donigerlawfirm.com Trevor W. Barrett (SBN 287174) tbarrett@donigerlawfirm.com DONIGER / BURROUGHS APC 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 355 Culver City, California 90230 Telephone: (310) 590-1820 Facsimile: (310) 417-3538 JS-6 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 Case No.: CV13-04648 PA (JCGx) Honorable Percy Anderson Presiding 14 STANDARD FABRICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 15 Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION 13 16 vs. Note: Changes Made by the Court 17 18 FOREVER 21 RETAIL, INC.; et al., 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ORDER: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This Action is dismissed with prejudice; 2. This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement agreement that gave rise to this dismissal; 3. The parties will each bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action; and 4. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreements entered into in this matter. 11 12 13 SO ORDERED. Date: April 7, 2014 By: _________________________ HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?