George Williams v. Yamaha Motor Co Ltd et al

Filing 115

JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, and that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. Related to: REQUEST for Entry of Judgment 114 . (jp)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

GEORGE WILLIAMS, LORENDA
OVERMAN, GERALD CHIARIELLO
II, CHARLES PENCINGER, STEVE
OETEGENN, BRIAN GILDERMAN,
JOSEPH RAMOS, ADAM DANIEL
JACKS, MARK D. COOPERMAN,
GERALD L. WASHINGTON,
EARNEST J. CAMILLERI, JR.,
SCOTT MARKOWITZ, JOE DiORIO,
THOMAS BLATT, MATTHEW J.
BONZELLA, JOE GARSETTI, PHILIP
KIRSOPP. WILLIAM KRATZ,
WILLIAM NEFF and JAMES R.
KRAPF on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,

23

Plaintiffs,

24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

v.
YAMAHA MOTOR CO., LTD.
and YAMAHA MOTOR
CORPORATION, U.S.A.,
Defendants.

Case No. 2:13-cv-5066 BRO (VBK)
Consolidated with Case No. 13-cv-01225
BRO (VBK) and Case No. 13-cv-07949
BRO (VBK)

JUDGMENT

1
2
3

On August 19, 2014 (DKT#78), this Court dismissed the claims brought against
Defendant Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. on the basis of lack of jurisdiction.
On April 29, 2015 (DKT #111), this Court entered an Order Granting Defendant

4

Yamaha Motor Co., U.S.A.’s Motion to Dismiss (“April 29 Order”). In the April 29

5

Order, the Court dismissed, with prejudice, all claims in the Second Amended and

6

Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed by Plaintiffs on February 2, 2015.

7

Based on the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY

8

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant

9

Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. are hereby dismissed.

10

Based on the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY

11

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant

12

Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, and that

13

judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

Dated: May 29, 2015

16
17
18

By:
HON. BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL
United States District Court Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

1