Speedzone Motorsports LLC v. RS Type Product Inc et al

Filing 26

ORDER APPROVING JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE PERFORMANCE OF CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Joint Request 25 , the court rules as follows: The complaint and counter-claims are dismiss ed without prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the conditional settlement agreement pursuant to its terms. The Court orders the parties to return to court on 1/26/2015 11:00 AM before Judge Christina A. Snyder, to follow up on t he status of the settlement. Should all payments be made according to the terms of the settlement agreement, counsel for plaintiff, Speedzone Motorsports, LLC., shall inform the Court so that they above status conference is taken off calendar and the matter dismissed with prejudice. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SPEEDZONE MOTORSPORTS, LLC, a California limited liability company, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, vs. RS TYPE PRODUCT, INC. d.b.a. RS TYPE, a California corporation; CHARLES M. TSAI, an individual; MAGGIE CHEN FEI HSU, an individual; WILLIAM CHUNG, an individual; AUTOTEC IMPORT, INC. d.b.a. GENKI TUNING d.b.a. D5 CONCEPTS, a California corporation; AUTOTEC INDUSTRIAL CORP., a California corporation; and DOES 1 to 30, Case No.:CV13-05079-CAS(PLAx) ORDER APPROVING JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE PERFORMANCE OF CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 - 1 – [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT 1 2 RS TYPE PRODUCT, dba RS TYPE, a California Corporation; CHARLES M. TSAI, an individual, 3 Counter-Claimant, 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 vs. SPEEDZONE MOTORSPORTS, LLC, a California limited liability company Counter-Defendant DENNIS FRANCISCO, an individual and ROES 1 through 20, inclusive, Third Party Defendants 12 13 14 15 This matter, having come before the Court on the Stipulation of plaintiff and counter-defendant SPEEDZONE MOTORSPORTS, LLC. (“SPEEDZONE”), third 16 party defendant DENNIS FRANCISCO (“FRANCISCO”), defendant and Counter- 17 claimant RS TYPE PRODUCT, INC. (“RS TYPE”), defendant and Counter- 18 claimant CHARLES M. TSAI (“TSAI”), defendant MAGGIE CHEN FEI HSU 19 20 (“HSU”), defendant WILLIAM CHUNG (“CHUNG”), defendant AUTOTEC 21 IMPORT, INC. (“AUTOTEC IMPORT”), and defendant AUTOTEC 22 INDUSTRIAL CORP. (“AUTOTEC INDUSTRIAL”) to dismiss the action and for 23 24 25 26 the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce performance of a conditional settlement agreement, the court rules as follows: 1. The complaint and counter-claims are dismissed without prejudice. 27 28 - 2 – [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the conditional settlement agreement pursuant to its terms. 3. The Court orders the parties to return to court at 11:00 a.m. on January 26, 2015 to follow up on the status of the settlement. 4. Should all payments be made according to the terms of the settlement agreement, counsel for plaintiff, Speedzone Motorsports, LLC., shall inform the Court so that they above status conference is taken off calendar and the matter dismissed with prejudice. 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED Dated:_August 29, 2014 ____________________________ Hon. Christina A. Snyder United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 3 – [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?