Jorge Cornejo et al v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 50

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Manuel L. Real, THE COURT having been advised by the counsel for the parties in the Notice ofSettlement (Docket Number 48) filed on October 2, 2014, that the above-entitled action has settled; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED tha t this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 90 days, to reopen the action if the settlement is not consummated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dates set in this action are hereby vacated. The Court reserves its jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the settlement. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pj)

Download PDF
1 ENTER JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JORGE CORNEJO, et al, Plaintiffs, 12 13 v. 14 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al, 15 Defendants. ____________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV-13-5234-R ORDER OF DISMISSAL 16 17 THE COURT having been advised by the counsel for the parties in the Notice of 18 Settlement (Docket Number 48) filed on October 2, 2014, that the above-entitled action 19 has settled; 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs 21 and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 90 days, to reopen the 22 action if the settlement is not consummated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dates set 23 in this action are hereby vacated. The Court reserves its jurisdiction for the purpose of 24 enforcing the settlement. 25 Dated NOVEMBER 12, 2014 26 27 28 MANUEL L. REAL United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?