j2 Global Inc et al v. Fax87.com et al
Filing
197
JUDGMENT UNDER FRCP 54(B) 155 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson 155 : The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Plaintiffs Plaintiffs j2 Cloud Services, LLC and Advanced Messaging Technologies, Inc.,and against Defendants Fax87, Matt Johnson Finance, Inc., One Voix, Miraluna Caberte Yardan, OnlineFaxes, SolidFax, FaxVision, eFax4Less, MyPhoneFax, and ResellFax as follows: MONETARY RELIEF: 1. On claims for monetary relief, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and each of the defendants refe renced above in the total amount of$26,145,697.00. 2. Each of Defendants Defendants Fax87, Matt Johnson Finance, Inc., One Voix, Miraluna Caberte Yardan, OnlineFaxes, SolidFax, FaxVision,eFax4Less, MyPhoneFax, and ResellFax is jointly and severa lly liable forthe amount of the judgment. 3. Post-judgment interest shall accrue in accordance with applicable federal law. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: Defendants and their agents etc. PRELIMINARILY AND PERMANENTLY ENJOINED RE CITED PATENTS ETC. RE DOCUMENT RE RECOVERYING CORPORATE ASSETS. (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Guy Ruttenberg, Bar No. 207937
guy@ruttenbergiplaw.com
Bassil Madanat, Bar No. 285280
bassil@ruttenbergiplaw.com
RUTTENBERG IP LAW,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1801 Century Park East, Suite 1920
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 627-2270
Facsimile: (310) 627-2260
Attorneys for Plaintiffs j2 Cloud Services, LLC. and
Advanced Messaging Technologies, Inc.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
j2 CLOUD SERVICES, LLC, AND
ADVANCED MESSAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiffs,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Case No. 13-cv-05353-DDP (AJWx)
JUDGMENT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.
54(B)
v.
FAX87, FARJAD FANI, MATT
JOHNSON FINANCE, INC., ONE
VOIX, MIRALUNA CABERTE
YARDAN, STEVEN THONG WAY
SEN, ROBERT BEAULIEU,
ONLINEFAXES, SOLIDFAX,
FAXVISION, EFAX4LESS,
MYPHONEFAX, RESELLFAX,
AND DOES 1-10
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] RULE 54(B) JUDGMENT
1
Upon the motion of Plaintiffs j2 Cloud Services, LLC and Advanced
2
Messaging Technologies, Inc., the Court hereby enters judgment under Fed. R. Civ.
3
P. 54(b) in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants Fax87, Matt Johnson Finance,
4
Inc., One Voix, Miraluna Caberte Yardan, OnlineFaxes, SolidFax, FaxVision,
5
eFax4Less, MyPhoneFax, and ResellFax as follows:
6
Monetary Relief
7
1. On claims for monetary relief, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and
8
each of the defendants referenced above in the total amount of
9
$26,145,697.
10
2. Each of Defendants Defendants Fax87, Matt Johnson Finance, Inc., One
11
Voix, Miraluna Caberte Yardan, OnlineFaxes, SolidFax, FaxVision,
12
eFax4Less, MyPhoneFax, and ResellFax is jointly and severally liable for
13
the amount of the judgment.
14
15
3. Post-judgment interest shall accrue in accordance with applicable federal
law.
16
Injunctive Relief
17
4. Defendants Fax87, Matt Johnson Finance, Inc., One Voix, Miraluna
18
Caberte Yardan, OnlineFaxes, SolidFax, FaxVision, eFax4Less,
19
MyPhoneFax, and ResellFax and each their officers, directors, agents,
20
servants, employees, affiliates, attorneys, and all others in privity or concert
21
with them, including parents, subsidiaries, divisions, successors, and
22
assigns, are PRELIMINARILY AND PERMANENTLY ENJOINED
23
from:
24
a. Selling or offering for sale or otherwise providing in the United
25
States the Internet fax services currently offered through their
26
websites, including fax87.com, enterprise.fax87.com,
27
onlinefaxes.com, solidfax.com, faxvision.com, efax4less.com,
28
[PROPOSED] RULE 54(B) JUDGMENT
1
reserllfax.com, weirdfax.com, faxeightyseven.com, fax87.net,
2
enterprise.fax87.com, myphonefax.com, phonefax87.com,
3
internetfaxes.com and other sister or affiliated websites;
4
b. Selling or offering for sale or otherwise providing in the United
5
States any Internet fax services covered by U.S. Patent Nos.
6
6,208,638 (“the ’638 Patent”), 8,310,699 (“the ’699 Patent”), and
7
8,675,220 (“the ’220 Patent”);
8
9
10
11
c. Using j2’s EFAX® and E-FAX® marks, as well as any similar
marks, in connection with the sale and offer for sale of Internet fax
products and services; and
d. Providing instructions, components, software, technical support,
12
services or otherwise assisting, aiding, or abetting any other person or
13
entity in selling or offering for sale or otherwise providing Internet
14
fax services as described in subparagraphs (a), (b) or (c).
15
5. The terms of this injunction shall be enforceable against each of Defendants
16
Fax87, Matt Johnson Finance, Inc., One Voix, Miraluna Caberte Yardan,
17
OnlineFaxes, SolidFax, FaxVision, eFax4Less, MyPhoneFax, and
18
ResellFax, their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, affiliates,
19
attorneys, and all others in privity or concert with them, including parents,
20
subsidiaries, divisions, successors, and assigns.
21
Recovering Corporate Assets
22
6. Under Washington Business Corporation Act § 23B.14.070, Defendants
23
MJF and Fax87 shall use any undistributed assets to pay the judgment
24
entered in this case.
25
7. Defendants MJF and Fax87 are further ordered to collect assets distributed
26
to any shareholders, officers or directors in order to pay the judgment.
27
28
[PROPOSED] RULE 54(B) JUDGMENT
1
Entry of Final Judgment
2
8. This Court has determined that there is no just reason for delaying entry of
3
judgment against the defendants mentioned above. Accordingly, pursuant
4
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and 54(b), judgment is hereby entered against
5
Defendants Fax87, Matt Johnson Finance, Inc., One Voix, Miraluna
6
Caberte Yardan, OnlineFaxes, SolidFax, FaxVision, eFax4Less,
7
MyPhoneFax, and ResellFax, and in favor of Plaintiffs, according to the
8
terms set forth above.
9
10
11
DATED: December 15, 2016
Hon. Dean D. Pregerson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] RULE 54(B) JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?