California Sea Urchin Commission et al v. Rachel Jacobson et al

Filing 114

JUDGMENT 93 99 101 113 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Federal Defendants and Intervenor-Defendants and against Plaintiffs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated) (lom)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 CALIFORNIA SEA URCHIN COMMISSION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL BEAN, in his official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish & Wildlife & Parks, U.S. Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants, and FRIENDS OF THE SEA OTTER, et al., Intervenor-Defendants, and THE OTTER PROJECT, et al., Intervenor-Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- Case No. CV 13-5517-DMG (CWx) JUDGMENT 1 This Court having granted the cross-motions for summary judgment of Defendants 2 Michael Bean, Daniel M. Ashe, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (collectively, 3 “Federal Defendants”) and Intervenor-Defendants Center for Biological Diversity, 4 Friends of the Sea Otter, Humane Society of the United States, Defenders of Wildlife, 5 The Otter Project, Environmental Defense Center, and Los Angeles Waterkeeper 6 (collectively, “Intervenor-Defendants”) by Order dated March 3, 2017 [Doc. # 113], and 7 having denied the motion for summary judgment of Plaintiffs California Sea Urchin 8 Commission, California Abalone Association, California Lobster and Trap Fishermen’s 9 Association, and Commercial Fishermen of Santa Barbara (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) by 10 11 12 the same Order, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Federal Defendants and Intervenor-Defendants and against Plaintiffs. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 DATED: March 9, 2017 17 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?