Armando Beristain-Vargas v. Tight Quarters, Inc. et al

Filing 38

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi re Stipulation for Protective Order 36 . WHEREAS, on February 17, 2014, Plaintiff Armando Beristain-Vargas and Defendants Tight Quarters, Inc. and Telford T. Cottam filed a joint Stipulated Protective Order, Document #36 (Protective Order), in the above entitled action. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Protective Order, in its entirety, is hereby ordered into full force and effect. 37 (bem)

1

8

Jonathan Ricasa (SBN 223550)
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICE OF JONATHAN RICASA
2341 Westwood Boulevard, Suite 7
Los Angeles, California 90064
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Briana M. Kim (SBN 255966)
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICE OF BRIANA KIM
249 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 814
Long Beach, California 90802
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Armando Beristain-Vargas

2
3
4
5
6
7

15

Christine D. Baran, Bar No. 158603
[e-mail]
James R. Dye, Bar No. 239194
[e-mail]
Shaun J. Voigt, Bar No. 265721
[e-mail]
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP
2050 Main Street, Suite 1000
Irvine, California 92614
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]

16

Attorneys for Defendants Tight Quarters, Inc. and Telford T. Cottam

10
11
12
13
14

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
Armando Beristain-Vargas,
individually, and on behalf of all other )
)
similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Tight Quarters, Inc., Telford T.
)
Cottam, and Doe One through and
)
including Doe One Hundred,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

[PROPOSED]
Error! Unknown document property name.

Case No. CV13-05600 SJO (JCGx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Hon. S. James Otero
Complaint filed:
Date removed:
Trial date:

July 3, 2013
August 2, 2013
None

1
ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

2

WHEREAS, on February 17, 2014, Plaintiff Armando Beristain-Vargas and

3

Defendants Tight Quarters, Inc. and Telford T. Cottam filed a joint Stipulated Protective

4

Order, Document #36 (“Protective Order”), in the above entitled action.

5
6
7

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Protective Order, in its entirety, is hereby
ordered into full force and effect.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ____________________________________

8

________________________________________________________________________

9

________________________________________________________________________

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED:

12
13

Dated: February 24, 2014

14

JAY C. GANDHI

15

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED]
Error! Unknown document property name.

2
ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

PROOF OF SERVICE
(CCP § 1013(a) and 2015.5)

1
2
3
4

I, the undersigned, am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I
am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; am employed with the offices
of Fisher & Phillips LLP and my business address is 2050 Main Street, Suite 1000,
Irvine, California 92614.

6

On February 19, 2014, I served the foregoing document entitled [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER , on all the
appearing and/or interested parties in this action by placing the original a true copy
thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows:

7

SEE ATTACHED MAILING LIST

5

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

[by MAIL] I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited
with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at
Irvine, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of
the party served, service is presumed invalid if postage cancellation date or postage
meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing this affidavit.
[by ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION] I served the above listed document(s)
described via the United States District Court’s Electronic Filing Program on the
designated recipients via electronic transmission through the CM/ECF system on
the Court’s website. The Court’s CM/ECF system will generate a Notice of
Electronic Filing (NEF) to the filing party, the assigned judge, and any registered
users in the case. The NEF will constitute service of the document(s). Registration
as a CM/ECF user constitutes consent to electronic service through the court’s
transmission facilities.
[by PERSONAL SERVICE] I caused to be delivered by messenger such
envelope(s) by hand to the office of the addressee(s). Such messenger is over the
age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action and employed with ASAP
Corporate Services, Inc., whose business address is 17817 Gillette Avenue, Irvine,
California 92614.

20

FEDERAL - I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of
this Court at whose direction the service was made.

21

Executed on February 19, 2014 at Irvine California.

22
23
24
25

SHERRY L. HARPER
Print Name

By:
Signature

26
27
28

[PROPOSED]
Error! Unknown document property name.

3
ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

MAILING LIST
Armando Beristain-Vargas v. Tight Quarters, Inc.
USDC Case No. CV13-05600 SJO (JCGx)
Jonathan Ricasa
Law Offices of Jonathan Ricasa
2341 Westwood Blvd., Suite 7
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Armondo BeristainVargas

Briana M. Kim
Law Offices of Briana Kim
249 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 814
Long Beach, CA 90802
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Armondo BeristainVargas

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED]
Error! Unknown document property name.

4
ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER