Darwin National Assurance Company v. Richard M Rosenthal et al

Filing 42

JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6; Case Terminated). (vdr)

1
2
3

JS-6

4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

DARWIN NATIONAL ASSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

v.
RICHARD M. ROSENTHAL, et al.,
Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 13-5670 FMO (RZx)

JUDGMENT

17
18

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Re: Pending Motion, IT IS ADJUDGED that Darwin National

19

Assurance Company (“Darwin”) has no duty to defend or indemnify defendant Richard M.

20

Rosenthal in the Weiss Action because the Business Enterprise Exclusion bars coverage as to

21

Rosenthal; and Darwin has no duty to defend or indemnify defendants in the Weiss Action

22

because the Investment Advice Exclusion bars coverage.

23

dismissed with prejudice.

24

Dated this 24th day of September, 2014.

The above-captioned action is

25
26
27
28

/s/
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge