Julian M. Barron v. Aref Fakhoury et al
Filing
48
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING ADDRESS by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/31/2014. (see attached) (jm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 13-5827 CJC (FFM)
Title
JULIAN M. BARRON v. AREF FAKHOURY, et al.
Present: The
Honorable
Date
December 16, 2014
Frederick F. Mumm, United States Magistrate Judge
James Munoz
None
None
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None Present
None Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING
ADDRESS
On October 30, 2014, defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Third Amended
Complaint in this case. On November 4, 2014, the Court issued an order setting a
briefing schedule on defendants’ motion. The service copy of that order sent to plaintiff
has since been returned to the Court with the notation “Inactive” and “Refused.”
Pursuant to Local Rule 41-6:
A party proceeding pro se shall keep the Court and opposing parties
apprised of such party’s current address and telephone number, if any. If
mail directed by the Clerk to a pro se plaintiff's address of record is returned
undelivered by the Postal Service, and if, within fifteen (15) days of the
service date, such plaintiff fails to notify, in writing, the Court and opposing
parties of said plaintiff’s current address, the Court may dismiss the action
with or without prejudice for want of prosecution.
Local Rule 41-6; see Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988).
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order
why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to inform the Court of his
change of address.
Failure to file a timely response to this order within the time specified will be
deemed consent to the dismissal of this action.
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?