Lois Goodman v. Los Angeles Police Department et al

Filing 209

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is hereby entered infavor of Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES (erroneously sued and served herein as LOSANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT), DETECTIVE JEFFREY BRISCOE, DETECTIV ENICK PIKOR, DETECTIVE DAVID PETEQUE, DETECTIVE PAMELA PITCHER,COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (erroneously sued and served herein as Los Angeles CountyDepartment of Coroner), YULAI WANG (individually and in his official capacity as anemployee of the Los angel es County Coroners Office) (collectively, Defendants) andagainst Plaintiff LOIS GOODMAN; that the action be dismissed with prejudice; and thatDefendants may seek to recover their costs in accordance with Local Rule 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LOIS GOODMAN, an individual, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LOS ANGELES POLICE ) DEPARTMENT, et al. ) ) ) Defendants. ____________________________________ ) Case No. CV13-05959 JAK (MANx) Hon. John A. Kronstadt - Ctrm. 750 Roybal Hon. Mag. Margaret A. Nagle - Ctrm. 580 Roybal JUDGMENT JS-6 12 13 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is hereby entered in 15 favor of Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES (erroneously sued and served herein as LOS 16 ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT), DETECTIVE JEFFREY BRISCOE, DETECTIVE 17 NICK PIKOR, DETECTIVE DAVID PETEQUE, DETECTIVE PAMELA PITCHER, 18 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (erroneously sued and served herein as Los Angeles County 19 Department of Coroner), YULAI WANG (individually and in his official capacity as an 20 employee of the Los angeles County Coroner’s Office) (collectively, “Defendants”) and 21 against Plaintiff LOIS GOODMAN; that the action be dismissed with prejudice; and that 22 Defendants may seek to recover their costs in accordance with Local Rule 54. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 DATED: May 14, 2015 26 ________________________________ JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?