Yolanda Trotter et al v. The County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 9

MINUTES (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. On October 3, 2013, Yolanda Trotter ("Trotter") filed a Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees in this action. On October 11, 2013, the Court granted her Request based on the financial information contained therein. On October 18, 2013, Trotter signed a second Request, and submitted it to the Court. Trotter's responses to certain financial questions in the second Request are entirely different from the same q uestions in the first Request. Trotter signed both Requests under penalty of perjury. Accordingly, NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 29, 2013, Trotter is ordered to show cause why the Court's authorization to file this action without prepayment of the filing fees should not be withdrawn, and this action dismissed, based on her inconsistent, yet sworn, responses. Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to follow court orders. (ch)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL
Case No. CV 13-6293-PA (PLAx)

Date October 22, 2013

Title: Yolanda A. Trotter, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
G U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE

PAUL L. ABRAMS

Christianna Howard
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:

: MAGISTRATE JUDGE

N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

NONE

PROCEEDINGS:

N/A
Tape No.

NONE

( IN CHAMBERS)

On October 3, 2013, Yolanda Trotter (“Trotter”) filed a Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees
in this action. On October 11, 2013, the Court granted her Request based on the financial information contained
therein. On October 18, 2013, Trotter signed a second Request, and submitted it to the Court. Trotter’s
responses to certain financial questions in the second Request are entirely different from the same questions in
the first Request. Trotter signed both Requests under penalty of perjury. Accordingly, no later than October
29, 2013, Trotter is ordered to show cause why the Court’s authorization to file this action without prepayment
of the filing fees should not be withdrawn, and this action dismissed, based on her inconsistent, yet sworn,
responses.
Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to
follow court orders.

cc:

Yolanda Trotter, pro se

Initials of Deputy Clerk

CV-90 (10/98)

CIVIL MINUTES -

GENERAL

ch