Eric Lamont Williams v. Richard B. Ives

Filing 9

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 7 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United S tates Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered (1) dismissing the petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; and (2) denying the motion for release on bond or own recognizance. (mp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

ERIC L. WILLIAMS,

11

Petitioner,

12
13
14

v.
RICHARD B. IVES, Warden,
Respondent.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. CV 13-6441-JVS (AGR)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

16
17

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, records

18

on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

19

Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of

20

the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and

21

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

22

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered (1) dismissing the petition

23

without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; and (2) denying the motion for release on

24

bond or own recognizance.

25
26
27
28

DATED: October 15, 2013

JAMES V. SELNA
United States District Judge