Paul Mankin v. Mountain West Research Center LC et al
Filing
35
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated)."see final judgment for specifics" (bp)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
PAUL MANKIN, individually and on
behalf of all others similar situated,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
MOUNTAIN WEST RESEARCH
CENTER, L.C., and DOES 1 through
10, inclusive, and each of them,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
-1-
Case No. 2:13-cv-06447-DSF-AGR
CLASS ACTION
ORDER AND FINAL
JUDGMENT
1
On July 8, 2014, Plaintiff Paul Mankin and Defendant Mountain West
2
Research Center (MWRC) entered into a Class Action Settlement Agreement
3
(Agreement), which is subject to review under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of
4
Civil Procedure. On July 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed the Agreement, along with
5
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and
6
Certification of Settlement Class.
7
8
9
Defendant served written notice of the proposed class action settlement
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1715.
On September 16, 2014, the Court entered an Order of Preliminary Approval
10
of Class Action Settlement. Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, the
11
Court, among other things: (i) preliminarily certified (for settlement purposes only)
12
a class of plaintiffs (Class Members) with respect to the claims asserted in the
13
Action; (ii) preliminarily approved the proposed settlement; (iii) appointed Plaintiff
14
Paul Mankin as the Class Representative; (iv) appointed John Kristensen and David
15
Weisberg of Kristensen Weisberg, LLP as Class Counsel; and (v) set the date and
16
time of the Final Approval Hearing for January 12, 2015, at 1:30 p.m.
17
18
19
On December 15, 2014, Class Counsel timely filed their motion for
attorneys’ fees, costs, and incentive award.
On December 15, 2014, Plaintiff filed the Motion for Final Approval of
20
Class Action Settlement Agreement, requesting final certification of the
21
settlement class under Rule 23(b)(3) and final approval of the proposed class
22
action settlement.
23
On January 12, 2015, a Final Approval Hearing was held to determine
24
whether the lawsuit satisfies the applicable prerequisites for class action
25
treatment and whether the proposed settlement is fundamentally fair, reasonable,
26
adequate, and in the best interests of the Class Members and should be approved
27
by the Court. The Court has read and considered the Agreement, Final Approval
28
Motion, and the record. All capitalized terms used in this Order have the
-2-
1
meanings defined in this Order or in the Agreement.
2
IT IS ORDERED:
3
1.
4
Agreement.
5
2.
6
been satisfied.
7
3.
8
only, as a class action on behalf of the following Settlement Class members with
9
respect to the claims asserted in the Action:
The Court has subject matter jurisdiction to approve this settlement and the
The Court finds that the prerequisites of Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(b)(3) have
Pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3), the Action is certified, for settlement purposes
10
All mobile subscribers who were called by Mountain West Research
11
Center on their mobile phones to 15,703 unique mobile numbers in
12
connection with the Survey Campaigns for campaigns on May 18 to
13
May 20, 2013 and July 22 to 24, 2013.
14
Defendant and its subsidiaries and affiliates, employees, officers, directors,
15
agents and representatives and its family members; Class Counsel; all judicial
16
officers who have presided over the Lawsuit; and all persons who timely elected
17
to become Opt-Outs from the Settlement Class in accordance with the
18
Preliminary Approval Order are excluded from the Settlement Class.
19
4.
20
and adequate as to all Parties and in compliance with all requirements of due
21
process and applicable law, as to and in the best interests of all Parties, and
22
directs the Parties and their counsel to implement and consummate the
23
Agreement in accordance with its terms and provisions.
24
5.
25
of the Final Judgment, this Final Judgment is intended by the Parties and the
26
Court as binding on and having res judicata and preclusive effect in all pending
27
and future lawsuits or other proceedings encompassed by the Release (as set
28
forth in Paragraph I.24) maintained by or on behalf of Named Plaintiff Paul
The Court grants final approval to the Agreement as being fair, reasonable,
To the extent permitted by law and without affecting the other provisions
-3-
1
Mankin and all other Settlement Class Members, as well as their agents, heirs,
2
executors or administrators, successors and assigns.
3
6.
4
(i) constituted the best practicable notice, (ii) constituted notice that was
5
reasonably calculated under the circumstances to apprise Settlement Class
6
Members of the pendency of the Lawsuit, of their right to object to or exclude
7
themselves from the proposed settlement, of their right to appear at the Final
8
Approval Hearing, and of their right to monetary and other relief; (iii) constituted
9
reasonable, due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to receive
The Court finds that the Class Notice sent to Settlement Class Members:
10
notice; and (iv) met all applicable requirements of due process and any other
11
applicable law.
12
7.
13
Settlement Class.
14
8.
15
of Kristensen Weisberg, LLP as Class Counsel.
16
9.
17
represented the Settlement Class for purposes of entering into and implementing
18
the proposed settlement and the Settlement Agreement.
19
10.
20
conclusively compromised, settled, dismissed, and released any and all Released
21
Claims against Defendant and the Releasees.
22
11.
23
fee award, requiring an “adequate explanation in the record of any ‘special
24
circumstances’ justifying a departure.” In re Bluetooth Headset Prods. Liab.
25
Litig., 654 F.3d 935, 942 (9th Cir. 2011). Although Class Counsel’s lodestar
26
amount is significantly lower than 25% of the common fund, the Court does not
27
find that to be a “special circumstance” justifying a significant downward
28
departure. The Court concludes that the lodestar analysis should be given little
The Court certifies plaintiff Paul Mankin as the representative of the
The Court certifies John P. Kristensen, Esq. and David L. Weisberg, Esq.
The Court finds that Class Counsel and the Named Plaintiff adequately
The Court finds that the Named Plaintiff and the Settlement Class have
The Ninth Circuit has established 25% as the benchmark for a reasonable
-4-
1
weight in determining the appropriate fee. Had the lodestar been approximately
2
equal to the 25% benchmark, the Court would most certainly have declined to
3
allow a multiplier. Under the circumstances, the Court finds that Class
4
Counsel’s award will be so substantially above the lodestar (even assuming the
5
lodestar figure were accurate) that an award of 25% of the common fund is
6
adequate to compensate counsel for both their fees and costs. Therefore, the
7
Court awards Class Counsel in attorneys’ fees and costs of $373,750, which sum
8
the Court finds to be fair and reasonable. This award and the reimbursement of
9
expenses shall be paid from the Settlement Fund by the Settlement Administrator
10
no later than seven business days after the Effective Date.
11
12.
12
settlement and in recognition of the Named Plaintiff’s efforts on behalf of the
13
Settlement Class, the Named Plaintiff is awarded $1,000 as an incentive award
14
directly related to his representation of the Settlement Class. The substantiation
15
of the Named Plaintiff’s efforts was somewhat vague and unsupported, and
16
(unlike the claims of many other class action plaintiffs), he asserts no risk
17
involved in participating in the litigation. The Court finds that a somewhat
18
reduced incentive award is fair and reasonable. This award shall be paid by the
19
Settlement Administrator from the Settlement Fund via a check made out to Paul
20
Mankin and delivered to Class Counsel no later than seven business days after
21
the Effective Date.
22
13.
23
to create the Settlement Fund and distribute the monies in accordance with this
24
Agreement and the Court’s Orders pertaining to the settlement. The Court
25
authorizes payment to the Administrator of its fees and costs, as approved by
26
Class Counsel, in an amount not to exceed $55,000. Should the Administrator’s
27
costs exceed that amount, Class Counsel and the Administrator may seek further
28
approval from the Court.
In addition to any recovery that the Named Plaintiff may receive under the
The Court orders the Settlement Administrator to take all steps necessary
-5-
1
14.
2
purposes of appeal, the Court reserves jurisdiction over the Settlement
3
Administrator, Defendant, the Named Plaintiff, and the Settlement Class as to all
4
matters relating to the administration, consummation, enforcement, and
5
interpretation of the terms of the settlement and Final Order and Judgment and
6
for any other necessary purposes.
7
15.
8
Settlement Class Members who have not been excluded from the Settlement
9
Class shall be barred from asserting any Released Claims against Defendant and
Without affecting the finality of the Final Order and Judgment for
The Court orders that upon the Effective Date, the Named Plaintiff and all
10
any Releasee, and shall have released any and all Released Claims against
11
Defendant and all Releasees.
12
16.
13
related proceedings are not and should not in any event be offered or received as
14
evidence of, a presumption, concession, or an admission of liability or of any
15
misrepresentation or omission in any statement or written document approved or
16
made by Defendant or any Releasee or the suitability of these or similar claims to
17
class treatment in active litigation and trial; provided, however, that reference
18
may be made to this Agreement and the settlement in such proceedings as may
19
be necessary to effectuate this Agreement.
20
17.
21
is a complete list of all Settlement Class Members who have timely requested
22
exclusion from the Settlement Class and, accordingly, shall neither share in nor
23
be bound by the Final Order and Judgment; provided that any Opt-Out who
24
subsequently provides written notice to the Settlement Administrator within 14
25
days of the entry of this Order that he or she is rejoining the Settlement Class
26
shall be deemed to be a Settlement Class Member and therefore bound by the
27
Final Order and Judgment and entitled to the benefits of the settlement.
28
18.
The Court determines that the Agreement and the settlement and any
The Court approves the Opt-Out List and determines that the Opt-Out List
The Court authorizes the Parties, without further approval from the Court,
-6-
1
to agree to and adopt such amendments, modifications and expansions of the
2
Agreement and all Exhibits hereto that (i) shall be consistent in all material
3
respects with the Final Order and Judgment and that (ii) do not limit the rights of
4
the Parties or Settlement Class Members.
5
19.
6
who have not been properly excluded from the Settlement Class (i) from filing,
7
commencing, prosecuting, intervening in, or participating as plaintiff, claimant or
8
class member in any other lawsuit or administrative, regulatory, arbitration or
9
other proceeding against Defendant in any jurisdiction based on, relating to or
The Court bars and permanently enjoins all Settlement Class Members
10
arising out of the claims and causes of action or the facts and circumstances
11
giving rise to the Lawsuit or the Released Claims; (ii) from filing, commencing
12
or prosecuting a lawsuit or administrative, regulatory, arbitration or other
13
proceeding against Defendant as a class action on behalf of any Settlement Class
14
Members who have not timely excluded themselves (including by seeking to
15
amend a pending complaint to include class allegations or seeking class
16
certification in a pending action), based on, relating to, or arising out of the
17
claims and causes of action or the facts and circumstances giving rise to the
18
Lawsuit or the Released Claims; and (iii) from organizing Settlement Class
19
Members who have not been excluded from the Settlement Class into a separate
20
class for purposes of pursuing as a purported class action any lawsuit or
21
arbitration or other proceeding (including by seeking to amend a pending
22
complaint to include class allegations or seeking class certification in a pending
23
action) against Defendant based on, relating to, or arising out of the claims and
24
causes of action or the facts and circumstances giving rise to the Lawsuit or the
25
Released Claims.
26
20.
27
dismissed with prejudice on the merits and in full and final discharge of any and
28
all such claims, without fees or costs except as specifically provided in this
The Lawsuit (including all individual and class claims) shall be and is
-7-
1
Order.
2
21.
3
captioned action in its entirety.
4
22.
5
Dismissal with Prejudice, the Court retains continuing and exclusive jurisdiction
6
over the Parties and all matters relating to the Action and Agreement, including
7
the administration, interpretation, construction, effectuation, enforcement, and
8
consummation of the settlement and this order.
This Order is intended to be a final judgment disposing of the above
Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment and Order of
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: January 13, 2015
____________________________
Honorable Dale S. Fischer
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-8-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?