Valerie A Cruz Smith v. Carolyn W Colvin

Filing 16

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency, 15 . The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand") lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division SUSAN L. SMITH, CSBN 253808 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415-977-8973 Facsimile: 415-744-0134 E-Mail: susan.l.smith@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 WESTERN DIVISION 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 VALERIE A. CRUZ SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) No. 2:13-cv-06860-AGR ) ____________ ) JUDGMENT OF REMAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 22 Defendant. 23 The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of 1 Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: April 22, 2014 HON. ALICIA G. ROSENBERG UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?