Valerie A Cruz Smith v. Carolyn W Colvin
Filing
16
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency, 15 . The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand") lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
SUSAN L. SMITH, CSBN 253808
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415-977-8973
Facsimile: 415-744-0134
E-Mail: susan.l.smith@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
13
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
WESTERN DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
VALERIE A. CRUZ SMITH,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
) No. 2:13-cv-06860-AGR
) ____________
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
22
Defendant.
23
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
24
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
(“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within
Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of
1
Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: April 22, 2014
HON. ALICIA G. ROSENBERG
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?