Eclipse IP LLC v. Ridecharge Inc

Filing 23

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge S. James Otero: The Court strikes the Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 2, 2014, re Amended Complaint 20 filed by Defendant Ridecharge Inc. on 01/03/2014 and the Stipulation for Extensio n of Time to File Answer to January 17, 2014, re Amended Complaint 21 filed by Defendant Ridecharge Inc. on 01/03/2014, for failure to comply with this Courts Standing Order regarding mandatory chamber's copies, and Local Rules 5-4.4 Submiss ion of Proposed Orders, Judgments, or Other Proposed Documents That Require a Judge's Signature and 5-4.5 Mandatory Chambers Copies. Additionally, attorney Christopher C Campbell has not formally applied for Pro Hac Vice in this matter. Accord ingly, Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than January 21, 2014, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Or der to Show Cause, on or before the above date: Answer by the Defendant(s) or Plaintiff's request for entry of default; In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (jre)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. C V 13-07153 SJO (JCx) Title Eclipse IP LLC v. Ridecharge Inc Present: The Honorable Date January 15, 2014 JAMES OTERO, Judge presiding Victor Cruz Not Present Deputy Clerk Court Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS: The Court strikes the Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 2, 2014, re Amended Complaint [20] filed by Defendant Ridecharge Inc. on 01/03/2014 and the Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 17, 2014, re Amended Complaint [21] filed by Defendant Ridecharge Inc. on 01/03/2014, for failure to comply with this Court’s Standing Order regarding mandatory chamber's copies, and Local Rules 5-4.4 Submission of Proposed Orders, Judgments, or Other Proposed Documents That Require a Judge’s Signature and 5-4.5 Mandatory Chambers Copies. Additionally, attorney Christopher C Campbell has not formally applied for Pro Hac Vice in this matter. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than January 21, 2014, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date: Answer by the Defendant(s) or Plaintiff's request for entry of default; In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED. : Initials of Preparer CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL vpc Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?