Sara G. Melena et al v. WSF Industries, Inc. et al

Filing 72

ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS AGAINSTDEFENDANT TECHNICAL, INC. DISMISSING CASE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal 71 filed concurrently with this Order, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiffs claims against Defendant TECHNICAL, INC. only. (vv)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

SARA G. MELENA, Individually and as )
Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of
)
JOSE MELENA; ANTONIO MELENA, )
Individually; ALMA MELENA,
)
Individually; PEDRO MELENA,
)
Individually; SARA MELENA,
)
Individually; EMMA CORTEZ,
)
Individually; and CHRISTINA
)
MELENA, Individually
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WSF INDUSTRIES, INC.; IPC
)
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC.;
)
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES
)
CORPORATION; JBT FOODTECH
)
MADERA; TECHNICAL, INC.; and
)
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV13-07321 DDP (AGRx)

ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AS TO
PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS AGAINST
DEFENDANT TECHNICAL, INC.

Removed 10/3/13 From Los Angeles
County Superior Court
(LASC Case No. BC 518576, filed
8/16/13)
[CLOSED]

24
25
26

///

27

///

28

///
1
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEF. TECHNICAL

1

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal filed concurrently with this Order, the

2

above-entitled action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiffs’ claims

3

against Defendant TECHNICAL, INC. only.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8

DATED: March 10, 2016

_______________________________
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEF. TECHNICAL