Akop Vardazaryan v. Frank Chavez
Filing
27
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation, Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition, and Dismissing this Action with Prejudice by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. (See Order for complete details) (afe)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 AGOP VARDAZARYAN,
Petitioner,
11
12
v.
13 FRANK CHAVEZ, Warden,
14
15
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. LA CV 13-07469-VBF-AS
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation,
Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition, and
Dismissing this Action with Prejudice
16
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the habeas corpus petition (CM/ECF
19 Document (“Doc”) 1), the respondent’s answer and accompanying memorandum (Doc 13), the lodged
20 documents (Doc 14), petitioner’s traverse (Doc 16), the May 20, 2015 Report and Recommendation
21 (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc 22), and the timely written objections of petitioner
22 (Doc 26) filed June 22, 2015. Respondent has not exercised his Fed. R. Civ. 72(b)(2) right to file a response
23 to the objections within fourteen calendar days of being served with a copy of the objections. After
24 reviewing de novo those portions of the R&R to which petitioner specifically objected, the Court finds no
25 error of law, fact, or logic in the R&R and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions.
26 Accordingly:
27
28
Petitioner’s objection [Doc # 26] is OVERRULED.
1
The Report and Recommendation [Doc # 22] is ADOPTED.
2
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc # 1] is DENIED.
3
4
The Court will rule on a certificate of appealability by separate order. As required by Fed. R. Civ.
5 P. 58(a), final judgment will be entered by separate document.
6
7
The Clerk of Court SHALL TERMINATE and close this case.
8
9 DATED: July 14, 2015
10
11
12
___________________________________
13
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK
Senior United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?