Romex Textiles Inc v. Lin Chen Industrial Co Ltd
Filing
35
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. On August 13, 2015, this Court granted Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment against Lin Chen. (ECF No. 34 .)In accordance with that Order, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, andDECREED as follows: 1. Lin Chen is liable for Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, breach of express and implied warranties, and fraud; 2. Plaintiff shall recover from Lin Chen the sum of Three Hundred and Three Thousand, One Hundred Dollars ($303,100.00). IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
ROMEX TEXTILES, INC.,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
Case No. 2:13-cv-07473-ODW (PJW)
JUDGMENT
LIN CHEN INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.,
Defendant.
15
16
17
On October 9, 2013, Plaintiff Romex Textiles, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action
18
against Defendants Lin Chen Industrial Co., Ltd. (“Lin Chen”) for breach of contract,
19
breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, unjust
20
enrichment, fraud, and misrepresentation. (ECF No. 1.) On April 30, 2014, the Clerk
21
of Court entered a default against Lin Chen. (ECF No. 26.) On August 13, 2015, this
22
Court granted Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment against Lin Chen. (ECF
23
No. 34.)
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
///
2
///
3
4
5
6
7
8
In accordance with that Order, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED as follows:
1.
Lin Chen is liable for Plaintiff’s claims for breach of contract, breach of
express and implied warranties, and fraud;
2.
Plaintiff shall recover from Lin Chen the sum of Three Hundred and
Three Thousand, One Hundred Dollars ($303,100.00).
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
September 21, 2016
13
14
15
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?