American International Industries v. Georgie Beauty LLC et al

Filing 36

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (ah)

Download PDF
JS-6 03/03/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, a California General 13 Partnership, Plaintiff, 14 15 CASE No. CV13-7515 MMM (MANx) [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION v. 16 GEORGIE BEAUTY, LLC, a New York Corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0067.221\9957 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1 Based upon the Stipulation signed by counsel for Plaintiff American 2 International Industries, Inc., (“AII”) and counsel for Defendant Georgie Beauty, LLC 3 (“Georgie Beauty”) for a Final Judgment in this action, the Court enters this Final 4 Judgment and Permanent Injunction prohibiting Defendant from infringing Plaintiff’s 5 intellectual property, including the federally registered WINKS trademark, U.S. Reg. 6 No. 3,247,268 (the “Winks Trademark”), as part of a comprehensive settlement. 7 8 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that: 9 1. Plaintiff American International Industries, Inc.’s Motion for Entry of 10 Default Judgment is denied as moot. 11 2. Defendant Georgie Beauty, LLC, their owners, officers, agents, servants, 12 employees, and all those in active concert or participation with any of them, are 13 permanently restrained and enjoined from doing any of the following anywhere in the 14 world: a. 15 Acquiring, purchasing, manufacturing, marketing, storing, 16 transporting, distributing, dealing in, hypothecating, offering for 17 sale or selling, directly or indirectly, of any beauty product, 18 materials or packaging therefor, including but not limited to 19 artificial eyelash products, that bears the Winks Trademark used for 20 personal care products, where the Winks Trademark is valid. 21 b. Using or otherwise infringing the Winks Trademark. 22 c. Causing, directing, soliciting, assisting, aiding, or abetting any 23 other person or business entity in engaging in or performing any of 24 the activities referred to in the above paragraphs (a) & (b). 25 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement 26 Agreement of the Parties and the Permanent Injunction in this Judgment. 27 4. All claims are dismissed with prejudice. 28 0067.221\9957 -1- [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 5. 1 Final Judgment is hereby entered, with each party responsible for its own 2 costs. 3 DATED: March 3, 2015 4 5 Honorable Margaret M. Morrow United States District Court Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0067.221\9957 -2- [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?