Marsha Brandon v. Los Angeles County Sheriff Department et al
Filing
44
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action without prejudice. (Attachments: # 1 R&R) (sp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MARSHA BRANDON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF
)
DEPARTMENT “DEPUTY MORALES,” )
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)
NO. CV 13-7613-PSG(E)
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable
19
Phillip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28
20
U.S.C. section 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States
21
District Court for the Central District of California.
22
23
In this pro se civil rights action, the United States Court of
24
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit filed a Memorandum on November 27, 2015,
25
remanding the action to this Court for further proceedings.
26
Ninth Circuit’s Mandate was filed on December 22, 2015.
27
///
28
///
The
1
On the same date, mail previously sent to Plaintiff at her
2
address of record was returned to this Court undelivered.
Thus,
3
Plaintiff evidently has failed to keep this Court apprised of her
4
current address.
5
prejudice.
6
civil rights plaintiff’s failure to advise court of change in address
7
warrants dismissal without prejudice); L.R. 41-6 (authorizing
8
dismissal of an action fifteen days after the return of undelivered
9
mail where a party proceeding pro se has failed to keep the court
Accordingly, this action should be dismissed without
See Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439 (9th Cir. 1988) (pro se
10
apprised of the pro se party’s current address); see also Fed. R. Civ.
11
P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962) (court has
12
inherent power to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of
13
cases by dismissing actions for failure to prosecute).
14
15
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Court issue
16
an Order: (1) accepting and adopting this Report and Recommendation;
17
and (2) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing the action
18
without prejudice.
19
20
DATED: January 7, 2016.
21
22
23
24
/S/
CHARLES F. EICK
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
NOTICE
Reports and Recommendations are not appealable to the Court of
3
Appeals, but may be subject to the right of any party to file
4
objections as provided in the Local Rules Governing the Duties of
5
Magistrate Judges and review by the District Judge whose initials
6
appear in the docket number.
7
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure should be filed until entry of
8
the judgment of the District Court.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No notice of appeal pursuant to the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?