Debra Hilton v. Apple Inc

Filing 63

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Gary A. Feess: Case Terminated. Made JS-6. On April 18, 2014, the Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss the amendedcomplaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) 62 . The Court allowed Plaintiff t he opportunity to amend her complaint by May 2, 2014. The Court specifically indicated that Plaintiff's failure to amend by that deadline would be deemed consent to dismissal of the case. To date, Plaintiff has not amended her complaint. This case is therefore DISMISSED. See document for details. (smo)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 13-7674 GAF (AJWx) Title Hilton v. Apple Inc. Present: The Honorable Date May 8, 2014 GARY ALLEN FEESS Stephen Montes Kerr Deputy Clerk None Court Reporter / Recorder N/A Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held) ORDER DISMISSING CASE On May 10, 2013, Plaintiff Debra Hilton (“Plaintiff”) filed this lawsuit against Apple, Inc. (Docket No. 1 [Compl.].) She eventually amended her complaint, alleging that Defendant violated various unfair competition laws when it sold products with hidden defects. (Docket No. 52 [First Am. Compl.] ¶¶ 46–55.) On April 18, 2014, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Docket No. 62 [4/18/14 Order] at 9.) The Court allowed Plaintiff the opportunity to amend her complaint by May 2, 2014. (Id.) The Court specifically indicated that Plaintiff’s failure to amend by that deadline would be deemed consent to dismissal of the case. (Id.) To date, Plaintiff has not amended her complaint. This case is therefore DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?