LegalZoom.com Inc v. Macey Bankruptcy Law PC et al

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) .(lc). Modified on 11/18/2013 (lc).

Download PDF
O JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., 12 13 14 15 16 17 v. Plaintiff, MACEY BANKRUPTCY LAW, P.C., MACEY BANKRUPTCY LAW HOLDING, P.C., LEAL HELPERS DEBT RESOLUTION, LLC, JACOBY & MEYERS–BANKRUPTCY, LLC, and DOES 1–10, inclusive, Case No. 2:13-cv-7894-ODW(MRWx) ORDER DISMISSING FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION Defendants. 18 On October 25, 2013, LegalZoom.com filed a Complaint in this Court. 19 LegalZoom contends that this Court has federal-subject-matter jurisdiction over this 20 action on the basis of diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (ECF No. 1.) 21 The Court issued an Order to Show Cause Re Subject Matter Jurisdiction on 22 November 18, 2013. (ECF No. 7.) The Court could not determine whether diversity 23 of citizenship exists in this action, because LegalZoom failed to state the citizenship of 24 the partners and members of Defendants Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, LLC and 25 Jacoby & Meyers–Bankruptcy, LLP. In the Order to Show Cause, the Court noted 26 that, unlike the citizenship of a natural person, the citizenship of a partnership or other 27 unincorporated entity is the citizenship of its members. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 28 494 U.S. 185, 195–96 (1990). The Court therefore held that it could not determine 1 whether diversity of citizenship existed, because LegalZoom did not allege the 2 citizenships of the partners and members of the respective entities. 3 On November 5, 2013, LegalZoom filed the Declaration of Andrew V. Jablon 4 in response to the Order to Show Cause. (ECF No. 8.) But again, LegalZoom fails to 5 sufficiently allege the citizenship of the partners and members of Jacoby & Meyers– 6 Bankruptcy, LLP.1 7 partnership between Macey Bankruptcy and Jacoby & Meyers. 8 LegalZoom must sufficiently allege the citizenship of both Macey Bankruptcy’s and 9 Jacoby & Meyer’s members. Jablon asserts that Jacoby & Meyers–Bankruptcy, LLP is a Accordingly, 10 Jablon avers that, “Jacoby & Meyers, LLC is an Alabama limited liability 11 company whose members . . . are John J. Givens and J. K. Givens, each of which 12 appear to be residents of the State of Alabama. (Jablon Decl. ¶ 4) (emphasis added). 13 This alone renders the response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause insufficient. 14 LegalZoom fails to allege the citizenships of John J. Givens and J. K. Givens. For the 15 purposes of complete diversity, citizenship is determined by the state of domicile—not 16 the state of residence.” Kantor v. Warner-Lambert Co., 265 F.3d 853, 857 (9th Cir. 17 2001); see also Jeffcott v. Donovan, 135 F.2d 213, 214 (9th Cir. 1943) (“Diversity of 18 citizenship as a basis for the jurisdiction of a cause in the District Court of the United 19 States is not dependent upon the residence of any of the parties, but upon their 20 citizenship.”). 21 Further, Jablon does not even mention Macey Bankruptcy in his declaration— 22 much less the citizenship of its members. LegalZoom has failed to properly respond 23 to the Court’s November 7, 2013 Order to Show Cause. The Court cannot determine 24 the citizenship of any of Macey Bankruptcy’s and Jacoby & Meyer’s members from 25 Jablon’s declaration. 26 jurisdiction exists in this case. The Court therefore remains unconvinced that diversity 27 28 1 LegalZoom dismissed defendant Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, LLC from this action on November 13, 2013. (ECF No. 14.) 2 1 For these reasons, the Court finds that it lacks jurisdiction over this case. This 2 action is therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter 3 jurisdiction. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 November 18, 2013 7 8 9 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?