LSI Products Inc v. Ashley Strand

Filing 28

ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. In an effort to timely resolve this matter, the Court orders Plaintiff to submit a status report updating the Court on the progress of Defendant's bankruptcy proceeding. This report should also include an indication of whether Plaintiff intends to continue prosecuting its case against Defendant. Plaintiff's failure to file a status report by October 25, 2016 will result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice without further warning from the Court. (See attached document for details.) (lom)

O

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

LSI PRODUCTS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

Case No. 2:13-CV-08363-ODW(RZ)

v.

ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT

ASHLEY STRAND,
Defendant.

15
16
17

On November 12, 2013, Plaintiff LSI Products Inc. filed a complaint alleging

18

that Defendant Ashley Strand had infringed its patent (U.S. Patent D659,062) for a

19

recreational vehicle door set. (Compl. ¶2, ECF No. 1.) Defendant failed to timely

20

answer.

21

Plaintiff’s request. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment with

22

the Court on December 30, 2013. (ECF No. 18.) However, before the Court could

23

rule on the motion, the case was stayed pending resolution of Defendant’s bankruptcy

24

proceeding. (ECF Nos. 24, 26.) Plaintiff was to notify the Court upon the termination

25

of Defendant’s bankruptcy proceeding. (Id.) Three years have passed since the Court

26

stayed this case and Plaintiff has not provided any update regarding the status of

27

Defendant’s bankruptcy proceeding. In an effort to timely resolve this matter, the

28

Court orders Plaintiff to submit a status report updating the Court on the progress of

On December 9, 2013, the Clerk entered default against Defendant at

1

Defendant’s bankruptcy proceeding. This report should also include an indication of

2

whether Plaintiff intends to continue prosecuting its case against Defendant.

3

Plaintiff’s failure to file a status report by October 25, 2016 will result in the

4

dismissal of this case without prejudice without further warning from the Court.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

October 11, 2016

8
9
10

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2