Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
Filing
205
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Amazon.Com Inc, Best Buy Co Inc, Costco Wholesale Corp, Sears Roebuck and Co, Target Corp, Wal-Mart Stores Inc against Guardian Media Technologies Ltd: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DE CREED THAT: 1. Summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 4,930,158 and 4,930,160 is granted to Defendants. 2. Defendants' Counterclaims for Invalidity and Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,930,158 and U.S. Patent No. 4,930,16 0 are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3. Defendants Counterclaims shall be fully reinstated upon remand, if any, from any appeal by Guardian. 4. Neither Guardian nor any Defendant waives any arguments they may have on appeal, and they expressly reserve all such issues. 5. This dismissal of Defendants' Counterclaims is not subject to the "two dismissal rule" of Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that a second dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
1
E-FILED 5/6/15
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
GUARDIAN MEDIA
TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
AMAZON.COM, INC., et al.
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
la-1285074
Case No. 2:13-cv-08369 PSG (PLAx)
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
1
The Court hereby enters final judgment against Plaintiff Guardian Media
2
Technologies, Ltd. and in favor of Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Best Buy Co.,
3
Inc., Costco Wholesale Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co., Target Corp., and Wal-Mart
4
Stores, Inc. (“Defendants”) as set forth below:
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED THAT:
6
1.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 4,930,158
and 4,930,160 is granted to Defendants.
2.
Defendants’ Counterclaims for Invalidity and Non-Infringement of
U.S. Patent No. 4,930,158 and U.S. Patent No. 4,930,160 are dismissed without
prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3.
Defendants’ Counterclaims shall be fully reinstated upon remand, if
any, from any appeal by Guardian.
4.
Neither Guardian nor any Defendant waives any arguments they may
have on appeal, and they expressly reserve all such issues.
5.
This dismissal of Defendants’ Counterclaims is not subject to the “two
16
dismissal rule” of Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which
17
provides that a second dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits.
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5/4/15
Dated: April ____, 2015
______________________________
Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
la-1285074
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?