CH2O Inc v. Meras Engineering Inc

Filing 449

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. JUDGMENT is hereby entered in this matter as follows: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of CH2O and against Defendants with respect to direct and literal infringement of claims 1, 2 and 7 of U.S. Patent No. 6,767,470 ("the '470 patent"). (SEE JUDGMENT FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS) (bp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISON CH2O, INC., Case No. CV13-08418 JAK (GJSx) 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 MERAS ENGINEERING, INC.; HOUWELING’S NURSERIES 15 OXNARD, INC.; HNL HOLDINGS LTD.; HOUWELING UTAH 16 OPERATIONS, INC.; and 17 HOUWELING’S NURSERIES LTD., 18 JUDGMENT Hon. John A. Kronstadt Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT Case No. CV-13-8418 JAK (GJSx) 1 This action came before the Court for trial by jury beginning June 2, 2016, 2 before a duly impaneled and sworn jury. The parties to the action are plaintiff 3 CH2O, Inc. (“CH2O”) and defendants Meras Engineering, Inc. (“Meras”), 4 Houweling’s Nurseries Oxnard, Inc., HNL Holdings Ltd., Houweling Utah 5 Operations, Inc., and Houweling’s Nurseries Ltd. (all five defendants are referred to 6 collectively as “Defendants”). The issues have been tried, and the jury rendered a 7 verdict on September 6, 2016. The verdict was accepted by the Court and filed by 8 the Clerk. 9 10 Therefore, pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, JUDGMENT is hereby entered in this matter as follows: 11 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered 12 in favor of CH2O and against Defendants with respect to direct and literal 13 infringement of claims 1, 2 and 7 of U.S. Patent No. 6,767,470 (“the ’470 patent”). 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is 15 hereby entered in favor of CH2O and against Meras with respect to indirect 16 infringement by inducement of claims 1, 2 and 7 of the ’470 patent. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is 18 hereby entered in favor of CH2O and against Defendants with respect to willful 19 infringement of claims 1, 2 and 7 of the ’470 patent. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is 21 hereby entered in favor of CH2O and against Defendants that Defendants did not 22 prove invalidity of claims 1, 2 and 7 of the ’470 patent based upon lack of 23 enablement and failure to satisfy the written description requirement. 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT 1 Case No. CV-13-8418 JAK (GJSx) 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is 2 hereby entered in favor of CH2O and against Defendants in the amount of 3 $12,500,000 for Defendants’ infringement of claims 1, 2 and 7 of the ’470 patent, 4 subject to interests, fees, and costs that may subsequently be awarded. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9   Dated: October 12, 2016 10 11 12 13 _________________________________________ Hon. John A. Kronstadt UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT 2 Case No. CV-13-8418 JAK (GJSx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?