C.S. Trading v. Dalian Suntime International Transportation Co Ltd et al
Filing
10
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams.Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing no later than January 14, 2014, why this action should not bedismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant Asbury Transportation Co. (See attached Order.) (es)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL
Case No. CV 13-8481-PLA
Date January 7, 2014
Title: C.S. Trading v. Dalian Suntime International Transportation Co. Ltd., et al.
G U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE
PAUL L. ABRAMS
Christianna Howard
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
: MAGISTRATE JUDGE
N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
NONE
PROCEEDINGS:
N/A
Tape No.
NONE
(IN CHAMBERS)
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing no later than January 14, 2014, why this action should not be
dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant Asbury Transportation Co.
The Court will consider the filing of an Answer by defendant Asbury Transportation Co., or plaintiff’s request
for entry of default, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date.
In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of
this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the
response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court’s Order may result in the dismissal of the
action as to defendant Asbury Transportation Co.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
cc:
Counsel of Record
Initials of Deputy Clerk
CV-90 (10/98)
CIVIL MINUTES -
GENERAL
ch
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?