Ronald G. Peeleman et al v. Central Mortgage Company et al
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order Remanding Action to State Court by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Accordingly, Defendants has failed to satisfy its burden of showing that the amount in controversy meets the jurisdictional requirement. In light of the foreg oing, the action is hereby remanded to state court for all further proceedings. Remanding case to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Santa Barbara, Case number 1438185 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Mailed 1/10/14) (Attachments: # 1 CV 103) (lom)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
Los Angeles Superior Court
County of Santa Barbara
1100 Anacapa Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93121-1107
Re: Case Number: 2:13-cv-08745-RGK
Previously Superior Court Case No. 1438185
Case Name: Ronald G. Peeleman et al v. Central Mortgage Company et al
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on 1/10/14
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: L. Muraoka
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
CV - 103 (09/08)
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?