City of Los Angeles v. Bae Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc et al

Filing 211

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case, 210 . This action, including all claims and counterclaims stated betweenthe Parties, is dismissed with prejudice. The Court will retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ACTING
) CASE NO. 13-CV-8810 CBM (AGRx)
BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF )
HARBOR COMMISSIONERS,
) ORDER OF DISMISSAL [JS-6]
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
BAE SYSTEMS SAN DIEGO SHIP
)
REPAIR INC., a California Corporation; ) [First Amended Complaint Served
and Does 1 thru 10, Inclusive,
) 8/18/14]
)
Defendants.
)
BAE SYSTEMS SAN DIEGO SHIP
)
REPAIR INC., a California Corporation, )
)
Counterclaimant,
)
)
v.
)
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ACTING
)
BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF )
HARBOR COMMISSIONERS,
)
)
Counterdefendant.
)

27
28
Page 1 of 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

13-CV-8810 CBM (AGRx)

1

The City of Los Angeles (the “City”) and BAE Systems San Diego Ship

2

Repair Inc. (“BAE Systems”) (collectively, the “Parties”) have submitted a

3

stipulation (“Stipulation”) to dismiss this action.

4
5
6

NOW, THEREFORE, good cause appearing from the Stipulation, the Court
orders as follows:

7
8
9
10
11

1.

This action, including all claims and counterclaims stated between

the Parties, is dismissed with prejudice.
2.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the terms of

the settlement agreement.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED:

14
15

Dated: March 1, 2017

16

___________________________
Consuelo B. Marshall
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

13-CV-8810 CBM (AGRx)