Romo Dimas et al v. Tapia Matilde et al

Filing 29

JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge Dean D. Pregerson : Judgment is hereby entered against Defendants Favian Tapia Matilde against defendants Delia Tapia, Favian Tapia Matilde and Delia Tapia in favor of Plaintiffs Alfredo Romo Dimas, I gnacio Romo Dimas, Juan Luis Romo Dimas, Rogelio Romo Dimas, Guillermo Romo Dimas, Gilberto Romo Dimas on Plaintiffs claims of federal trademark infringement and cancellation of Defendants trademark registration. The Court declines to award attorneys fees to Plaintiffs. Plaintiff is awarded costs of suit in an amount to be determined by theClerk of the Court. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc)

1
2
3
4
5

JS-6

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14

ALFREDO ROMO DIMAS, IGNACIO
ROMO DIMAS, JUAN LUIS ROMO
DIMAS, ROGELIO ROMO DIMAS,
GUILLERMO ROMO DIMAS,
GILBERTO ROMO DIMAS,

No. CV 13-08840 DDP (ASx)
JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT
INJUNCTION

15

Plaintiffs,

16

-vs.-

17
18
19

FAVIAN TAPIA MATILDE, DELIA
TAPIA,

20

Defendants.
21
22

The Court having granted the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs

23
24

Alfredo Romo Dimas, Ignacio Romo Dimas, Juan Luis Romo Dimas, Rogelio

25

Romo Dimas, Guillermo Romo Dimas and Gilberto Romo Dimas,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:

26
27
28

I.

JUDGMENT
1.

Judgment is hereby entered against Defendants Favian Tapia Matilde

-1-

JUDGMENT

1

and Delia Tapia in favor of Plaintiffs Alfredo Romo Dimas, Ignacio Romo Dimas,

2

Juan Luis Romo Dimas, Rogelio Romo Dimas, Guillermo Romo Dimas, Gilberto

3

Romo Dimas on Plaintiffs’ claims of federal trademark infringement and

4

cancellation of Defendants’ trademark registration.

5

II.

6

CANCELLATION OF REGISTRATION
2.

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that Registration No. 3,797,278 of

7

the trademark EL ROMANTICO SAMURAY before the United States Patent and

8

Trademark Office be, and hereby is, cancelled. The Clerk shall notify the United

9

States Patent and Trademark Office of the Court’s order.

10

III.

11

PERMANENT INJUNCTION
3.

Defendants Favian Tapia Matilde, Delia Tapia and their respective

12

officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other persons who are

13

in active concert or participation with any of the aforementioned persons who

14

receive actual notice of this Judgment of Permanent Injunction by personal service

15

or otherwise are hereby permanently ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from using

16

the service mark SAMURAY, or any confusingly similar or colorable imitation of

17

the mark, including without limitation the term EL ROMANTICO SAMURAY, in

18

any manner in connection with the sale, advertising, offering, announcing or

19

promotion of musical services, such as live performances of a musical group, or

20

products, such as phonograph records, CDs, DVDs or their digital counterparts.

21

IV.

22

IMPOUNDMENT AND DESTRUCTION
4.

Defendants Favian Tapia Matilde, Delia Tapia and their respective

23

officers, agents, servants, employees, and all persons in active concert or

24

participation with Defendants who receive actual notice of this order by personal

25

service or otherwise, are hereby ordered to remove and destroy all promotional

26

literature, advertising, goods and other materials relating to the use of the term

27

SAMURAY or EL ROMANTICO SAMURAY on or in connection with such

28

advertising, goods or other materials within seven (7) days following receipt of such

-2-

JUDGMENT

1

actual notice of this order, and to provide plaintiff’s counsel with evidence of such

2

removal and destruction within the same seven (7) day period following receipt of

3

such actual notice.

4

5.

Violation of the permanent injunction herein by any person enjoined

5

herein shall constitute contempt of court, and plaintiffs may seek to recover

6

reasonable attorney’s fees and costs expended in bringing a contempt motion.

7

IV.

FEES, COSTS AND RETENTION OF JURISDICITON

8

6.

The Court declines to award attorney’s fees to Plaintiffs.

9

7.

Plaintiff is awarded costs of suit in an amount to be determined by the

10
11
12
13

Clerk of the Court.
8.

The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the permanent injunction

included in this judgment.
9.

Plaintiff is hereby authorized to engage in post-judgment discovery as

14

necessary to ensure compliance with the Court’s Judgment and Permanent

15

Injunction.

16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

Dated: October 01, 2015

19

HON. DEAN D. PREGERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3-

JUDGMENT