Frank Brocato v. LAPD Officer Antonio Perez et al

Filing 80

PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND TAKING OF CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott 79 . (san)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FRANK BROCATO,

12
13

Plaintiff,

[PROPOSED]

15

17
18

Honorable Judge: Cormac J. Carney
Honorable Magistrate Judge: John E. McDermott

vs.

14

16

Case No.: CV 13-8993 CJC (JEM)

LAPD OFFICER ANTONIO PEREZ, et
al.
Defendants.

PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
AND TAKING OF CERTAIN
DEPOSITIONS

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Whereas counsel for the parties have discussed the mutual exchange of documents
in this litigation, Defendants, through their counsel of record, have agreed to produce
certain confidential information in this litigation, and therefore, the parties have
stipulated to the following terms and conditions, the Court hereby orders as follows:
1.

In accordance with the above-referenced agreement, the City of Los
1

1

Angeles has agreed to produce copies of the following documents following the

2

issuance of a protective order in this matter:

3

a)

The LAPD’s Internal Affairs Investigation Report and the attached

4

addenda relating to any citizen’s complaint for fraud, racial profiling and perjury

5

within the last five years.

6

b)

Plaintiff may purchase duplicate recordings of any recorded statement

7

taken in connection with the investigations referred to Paragraph 1(b) herein at a

8

cost of $10.00 per CD-rom if those recordings can be located by the LAPD’s

9

Professional Standards Bureau.

10

2.

The Los Angeles Police Department conducts internal administrative

11

investigations of Officer Involved Uses of Force and Complaint Investigations

12

(hereinafter “Administrative Investigations”) and also maintains a personnel file on its

13

officers which includes personnel training information.

14

Investigation is initiated, a formal investigation number is prepared. Such investigations

15

are reviewed by appropriate command officers in the Department. This review has

16

several purposes:

17

Department policies or procedures; (2) to determine whether administrative discipline

18

and/or retraining of the involved officers is necessary; and (3) to ascertain if police

19

policies and procedures in such areas as supervision, training, tactics, policies, etc.

20

should be modified. Administrative Investigations are an essential aid to providing

21

critical evaluation of Department officers and policies, and to determine the most

22

effective way to serve the citizens of Los Angeles.

23

3.

Once an Administrative

(1) to determine whether the involved officers violated any

The Department strives to maintain the confidentiality of an officer's

24

personnel package and Administrative Investigations, and the information contained

25

therein, in recognition of the protections granted pursuant to Penal Code § § 832.5,

26

832.7, and 832.8 and 1040 et al. of the California Evidence Code. Just as officer's

27

personnel package is maintained as confidential, so too are the Administrative

28

Investigations involving a particular officer(s). Administrative Investigations, like an
2

1

officer's personnel package, include information which is both personal in nature and

2

could potentially impact the liberty interests of the involved police officers and/or

3

civilians named within.

4

Administrative Investigations can, and have been used to initiate disciplinary action

5

against officers, as well as evidence in disciplinary proceedings where the officer's

6

conduct was considered to be contrary to Department policy. At this time, the parties

7

have agreed that certain Administrative Investigation information will be provided

8

pursuant to the terms set forth in this Protective Order. As a result, the parties have

9

agreed to this Proposed Protective Order covering these records for the following Good

10
11

The information obtained from personnel packages and

Cause reasons:
4.

Administrative Investigations are maintained as confidential reports and are

12

considered part of the individual officers' personnel record.

13

Investigations include information which is both personal in nature and could potentially

14

impact the liberty interests of the involved police officers and/or civilians named within.

15

The information obtained from Administrative Investigations can and have been used to

16

initiate disciplinary action against officers and as evidence in disciplinary proceedings

17

where the use of force or tactics used were considered to be contrary to Department

18

policy.

19

5.

Administrative

Unfettered release of Administrative Investigations have the potential for

20

untold negative results. In terms of societal interests, it would inhibit the Department’s

21

ability to frankly engage in critical self-analysis.

22

Administrative Investigations could severely threaten the safety and well-being of the

23

individuals, their families and associates. Many Administrative Investigations include

24

embarrassing facts. At a minimum, disclosure of an entire Administrative Investigation

25

would cause needless intrusion of privacy rights and have a negative effect on the

26

Department’s effort to conduct these important investigations. Indeed, for all of these

27

reasons, persons interviewed by Investigators are advised that their statements are being

28

taken for the confidential use of the Department.
3

Public exposure of many

1

6.

The materials and interview statements of Administrative Investigations are

2

maintained in protected files in order to maintain their confidentiality. They are not

3

routinely shown to other city departments. Even then, information which is not clearly

4

relevant to the rationale governing the request is redacted to ensure the utmost regard for

5

the privacy rights of the mentioned within a given report. The reports are not available

6

to the general public except by court order. In all instances, the Department requests in

7

camera hearing to determine the relevance for releasing all or part of a given report,

8

again to ensure the constitutionally protected privacy rights of those named or otherwise

9

identified within the body of the report.

10

7.

In each case involving court-ordered disclosure of information from an

11

Administrative Investigation sought in state or federal court, it is Department policy to

12

seek a protective order limiting use of the information to the case at trial and identifying

13

those persons who may properly be granted access to the information.

14

protective order, it becomes unrealistic to conceive that the large numbers of attorneys,

15

secretaries, law clerks, paralegals and witnesses involved in many cases will be able to

16

maintain proper confidence of personal, private material absent an order which clearly

17

delineates their responsibilities. The orders further request that said records be returned

18

to the Department after the case has terminated, either by final judgment or otherwise.

19

This request serves to ensure that intrusion into the privacy and employment rights of

20

those involved is limited to the particular case in which the facts are relevant.

21

8.

Absent a

Even with a carefully written protective order, the release of portions of an

22

Administrative Investigation, without prior judicial review to determine relevancy and

23

assess privacy concerns, ignores the constitutional protection given to individual privacy

24

under the United States and California Constitutions and which a third-party such as the

25

Department is obligated to assert. The issuance of an appropriate protective order

26

makes certain that these privacy concerns are not compromised beyond that degree

27

necessary to the issues before the court. Accordingly, on behalf of the Los Angeles

28

Police Department and those persons identified within a given Administrative
4

1

Investigation, the Defendants respectfully request these procedural protections in the

2

instant case.

3

9.

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate that the above-referenced Internal

4

Affairs Investigation is confidential in nature and is appropriately produced pursuant to

5

a protective order. (See Soto v. City of Concord, 162 F.R.D. 603, 616 (N.D. Cal.

6

1995.))

7
8

TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER
10.

If the Protective Order is issued, Defendants will produce the above-

9

referenced documents wherein the documents will be marked in one of the following

10

ways: “Confidential,” “Confidential Documents,” “Confidential Material,” “Subject to

11

Protective Order” or words of similar effect. Documents, writings, or other tangible

12

items, so designated, and all information derived therefrom (hereinafter, collectively

13

referred to as “Confidential Information”), shall be treated in accordance with the terms

14

of this stipulation and protective order.

15
16
17
18
19

11.

Confidential Information may be used by the persons receiving such

information only for the purpose of this litigation.
12.

Subject to the further conditions imposed by this stipulation, Confidential

Information may be disclosed only to the following persons:
(a)

Counsel for the parties, parties, and to experts, investigators, paralegal

20

assistants, office clerks, secretaries and other such personnel working under their

21

supervision.

22
23
24

(b)

Such other parties as may be agreed by written stipulation among the parties

hereto, or by Court order.
13.

Prior to the disclosure of any Confidential Information to any person

25

described in paragraph 12(a) or 12(b), counsel for the party that has received and seeks

26

to use or disclose such Confidential Information shall first provide any such person with

27

a copy of this stipulation, and shall cause him or her to execute, on a second copy which

28

counsel shall thereafter serve on the other party the following acknowledgment:
5

1

“I understand that I am being given access to Confidential Information

2

pursuant to the foregoing stipulation and order. I have read the Order and agree to be

3

bound by its terms with respect to the handling, use and disclosure of such Confidential

4

Information.

5
6

Dated: _______________/s/________________________”
14.

Upon the final termination of this litigation, including any appeal pertaining

7

thereto, all Confidential Information and all copies thereof shall be returned to the

8

Defendants City of Los Angeles through the City Attorney’s Office.

9

15.

If any party who receives Confidential Information receives a subpoena or

10

other request seeking Confidential Information, he, she or it shall immediately give

11

written notice to the Defendants’ counsel, identifying the Confidential Information

12

sought and the time in which production or other disclosure is required, and shall object

13

to the request or subpoena on the grounds of this stipulation so as to afford the

14

Defendants an opportunity to obtain an order barring production or other disclosure, or

15

to otherwise respond to the subpoena or other request for production or disclosure of

16

Confidential Material. Other than objecting on the grounds of this stipulation, no party

17

shall be obligated to seek an order barring production of Confidential Information,

18

which obligation shall be borne by the Defendants. However, in no event should

19

production or disclosure be made without written approval by the Defendants’ counsel

20

unless required by court order arising from a motion to compel production or disclosure

21

of Confidential Information.

22

16.

Any pleadings, motions, briefs, declarations, stipulations, exhibits or other

23

written submissions to the Court in this litigation which contain, reflect, incorporate or

24

refer to Confidential Information shall be submitted with an application that the

25

document be filed and maintained under seal either pursuant to Ex Parte Application and

26

Order of the Court or Stipulation of the parties and Order of the Court. (Local Rule 79-

27

5, et seq.) and in accordance with the District Court’s existing Pilot Program for the

28

filing of sealed documents. Good cause for the under seal filing must be shown. If a
6

1

document or pleading submitted to the Court, as described in this paragraph, makes only

2

a general reference to any document or information contained therein covered by this

3

protective order, but does not quote or describe its contents in any specific way, and

4

does not include the protected document itself, then the party or parties need not enter

5

into a Stipulation or otherwise seek an order to file the documents under seal. In

6

entering into a Stipulation for the filing of Confidential Information under seal, neither

7

one of the parties waives its right to object to the admissibility of said information in

8

connection with that proceeding or to move to exclude said information prior to or

9

during the time of trial.

10

17.

The parties agree that the spirit of confidentiality as protected in this order

11

will apply to all proceedings. To that end, before any protected document or any

12

information derived therefrom is to be put forward, admitted into evidence, discussed in

13

detail or otherwise publicized in Court, the party raising the protected document will

14

inform the other parties and allow for a motion to the Court to close the proceedings to

15

the public.

16

18.

Nothing herein shall prejudice any party's rights to object to the introduction

17

of any Confidential Information into evidence, on grounds including but not limited to

18

relevance and privilege.

19

19.

During the course of depositions, when counsel makes an objection to a

20

question concerning a protected document or information contained therein, which is the

21

subject of this Stipulation and protective order, or concerning a general area that counsel

22

believes should be covered by the scope of this Stipulation and protective order, those

23

witnesses (as identified in Paragraph 3(a) herein) may answer the question, without

24

waiving the objections, and the questions and answers to those questions will be sealed

25

and covered by the terms of this protective order. Counsel and the parties reserve the

26

right to object to the disclosure of confidential or private information which is not the

27

subject of this Stipulation and protective order. Any documents deemed confidential

28

pursuant to this protective order will be sealed, if they are used as exhibits in any
7

1

deposition. This agreement does not waive any objections counsel may make, including

2

objections unrelated to the reasons for this protective order.

3

20.

Each person receiving or reviewing Confidential Information must consent

4

to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Central District of

5

California, including the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case, with respect to any

6

proceeding relating to enforcement of this Order, including, without limitation, any

7

proceeding for contempt and/or monetary sanctions

8

21.

This Protective Order survives until the time the commencement of trial.

9

The parties hereto, however, may make a request to the District Judge, in advance of

10

trial, that the Confidential Information disclosed pursuant to the Protective Order remain

11

confidential and/or be kept and maintained pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order.

12

22.

This Stipulation may be signed in sub-parts and may be transmitted by

13

facsimile as if it was the original document. Defendants will lodge this executed

14

Stipulation with the Court for approval.

15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17

DATED: April 28, 2017

18
19

HONORABLE JOHN E. MCDERMOTT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8