Timothy Patrick McLanahan v. Brad Grey et al

Filing 13

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/25/2014. (rfi)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL
Case
No.: 2:13−cv−09381−BRO−PLA
Date:
Title: TIMOTHY PATRICK MCLANAHAN V. BRAD GREY ET AL
Present: The Honorable

6/4/2014

BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

Deputy Clerk: Renee Fisher
Court Reporter/Recorder: None
Tape No.: N/A
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
None
Proceedings:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None

(In Chambers)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for
lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to
dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter:
Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 120 days of the filing of the
Complaint. Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within
the 120 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC
will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Deputy Clerk: rfi

CV−90 (06/04)

− CIVIL MINUTES−GENERAL −

Page 1 of 1