Harry Haro et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A. et al

Filing 12

JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' federal claims for violations of the Truth in Lending Act, RESPA, Regulation Z, and declaratory relief premised on violations of RESPA are dismissed w ith prejudice and Plaintiffs' remaining state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

HARRY HARO and LAGRIMAS
HARO,

JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,

13
14

CV 13-9413 PA (ASx)

v.

16

RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.;
JOHN AND JANE DOE
CORPORATIONS OR OTHER
ENTITIES; and DOES 1-100, inclusive,

17

Defendants.

15

18
19

Pursuant to the Court’s March 3, 2014 Minute Order granting the Motion to Dismiss

20

filed by defendant Recontrust Company, N.A. (“Defendant”), which dismissed all of the

21

federal claims asserted by plaintiffs Harry Haro and Lagrimas Haro (collectively

22

“Plaintiffs”) with prejudice, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over

23

Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims and dismissed those claims without prejudice,

24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ federal

25

claims for violations of the Truth in Lending Act, RESPA, Regulation Z, and declaratory

26

relief premised on violations of RESPA are dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiffs’

27

remaining state law claims are dismissed without prejudice.

28

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take
nothing and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

DATED: February 28, 2014

_________________________________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-