In Re Namco Capital Group Inc
Filing
35
ORDER DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT 34 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell that the within Adversary Proceeding is dismissed with prejudice, all parties to bear their own fees and costs. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms and provisions of the settlement. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
STEVEN T. GUBNER – Bar No. 156593
RICHARD D. BURSTEIN – Bar No. 56661
ROBYN B. SOKOL – Bar No. 159506
RONALD P. ABRAMS – Bar No. 140438
EZRA BRUTZKUS GUBNER LLP
21650 Oxnard Street, Suite 500
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Telephone: (818) 827-9000
Facsimile: (818) 827-9099
Emails: sgubner@ebg-law.com; rburstein@ebg-law.com;
rsokol@ebg-law.com; rabrams@ebg-law.com
Special Counsel for Plaintiff,
Bradley D. Sharp, Liquidating Trustee
9
10
11
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re
District Case No. 2:13-cv-09416-BRO
NAMCO CAPITAL GROUP, INC., a
Bk. Case No. 2:08-bk-32333-BR
California corporation,
Chapter 11
Debtor.
Adv. Case No. 2:11-ap-01325-BR
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
BRADLEY D. SHARP, Liquidating
Trustee,
Plaintiff,
vs.
HAMID DAVID NAHAI, an individual,
aka DAVID NAHAI; and NAHAI LAW
CORPORATION, a California
corporation,
Defendants.
ORDER DISMISSING ADVERSARY
PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO
SETTLEMENT
Pre-Trial Conference:
Date: May 11, 2015
Time: 3:00 p.m.
Place: Courtroom 14
312 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1300190
The Court, having reviewed the Notice of Settlement filed herein and pursuant
to proceedings on April 27, 2015,
1
It Is Hereby Ordered that the within Adversary Proceeding is dismissed with
2
prejudice, all parties to bear their own fees and costs. The Court retains jurisdiction to
3
enforce the terms and provisions of the settlement.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: May 6, 2015
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1300190
By:
HON. BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?