Dylan Stewart v. San Luis Ambulance Inc et al

Filing 100

JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that: (1) judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Dylan Stewart in the amount of $750 on Plaintiffs first and second claims for relief; and (2) judgment is entered in favor of Defendant San Luis Ambulance Service, Inc. on Plaintiffs third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth claims for relief.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rfi)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE CALIFORNIA PLAZA, 37TH FLOOR
300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-3147

HILL, FARRER & BURRILL LLP

10
11

DYLAN STEWART,

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
vs.

CASE NO. CV13-09458-BRO (SSx)
[Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell]
JUDGMENT

SAN LUIS AMBULANCE
SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CV13-09458-BRO (SSX)
JUDGMENT

1

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD,

2

WHEREAS, on October 6, 2015, the Court entered partial summary

3

judgment against Plaintiff Dylan Stewart (“Plaintiff”) and in favor of Defendant

4

San Luis Ambulance Service, Inc. (“Defendant”) as to Plaintiff’s third, fourth, fifth,

5

sixth, seventh, and eighth claims for relief [Dkt. No. 85];

6

WHEREAS, on November 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Acceptance of

7

Offer of Judgment, accepting Defendant’s Rule 68 Offer of Judgment in Plaintiff’s

8

favor in the amount of $750 on Plaintiff’s first and second claims for relief, [Dkt.

9

No. 90];
WHEREAS, on November 19, 2015, the Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion for

10
11

Reconsideration, denied as moot Plaintiff's alternative request to certify for

12

interlocutory appeal, and dismissed Plaintiff’s ninth claim for relief for lack of

13

subject matter jurisdiction [Dkt. No. 96].
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

14
15

that: (1) judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Dylan Stewart in the amount of

16

$750 on Plaintiff’s first and second claims for relief; and (2) judgment is entered in

17

favor of Defendant San Luis Ambulance Service, Inc. on Plaintiff’s third, fourth,

18

fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth claims for relief.

19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

DATED: November 24, 2015

23

___________________________
HON. BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL

58002

24
25
26
27
28
-2JUDGMENT

CV13-09458-BRO (SSX)