Otter Products LLC et al v. Ace Colors Fashion, Inc et al

Filing 32

FINAL ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. DEFENDANT VANESSA ACCESSORIESS ABILITY TO PROCEED PRO SE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The Court once again ORDERS Vanessa Accessories through its representative to file a declaration establishing what type of legal entity it is by Friday, April 18, 2014. No hearing will be held. This is Vanessa Accessoriess final warning that failure to timely respond to this Order will result in the Court striking Vanessa Accessoriess Answer for want of licensed counsel. The Court informs Vanessa Accessories that there is a Federal Pro Se Clinic located in the United States Courthouse. (lc)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

United States District Court
Central District of California

9
10
11
12

OTTER PRODUCTS LLC; TREEFROG

13

Case No. 2:14-cv-00141-ODW(ASx)

DEVELOPMENTS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

14
15

FINAL ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
RE. DEFENDANT VANESSA

v.

16

ACE COLORS FASHION, INC.;

ACCESSORIES’S ABILITY TO

17

ELECTRONICOS; SHAYNA’S CELL

PROCEED PRO SE

18

PHONE ACCESSORIES; VANESSA

19

ACCESSORIES,

20

Defendants.

21

On January 7, 2014, Plaintiffs Otter Products LLC and Treefrog Developments,

22

Inc. filed a trademark-infringement suit against Defendants Ace Colors Fashion, Inc.,

23

Electronicos, Shayna’s Cell Phone Accessories, and Vanessa Accessories.

24

No. 1.) Defendant Vanessa Accessories subsequently filed an answer pro se through

25

an individual named Jose Rosales. (ECF No. 14.) On March 5, 2014, the Court

26

ordered Vanessa Accessories to submit a declaration establishing that it is a sole

27

proprietorship—and therefore that it has the ability to proceed pro se. (ECF No. 20.)

28

To date, Vanessa Accessories has not responded to the Court’s Order.

(ECF

1

It is well-settled that a corporation and other artificial entities may not represent

2

themselves in federal court. Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory

3

Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201–02 (1993); see also L.R. 83-2.2.2. But this rule does not

4

apply to sole proprietorships, as they do not have a legal existence independent of

5

their owners. See Nova Exp. v. United States, 80 Fed. Cl. 236, 238–39 (Fed. Cl.

6

2008); Bd. of Trs. of Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund for N. Cal. v. Perez,

7

No. C-10-2002 JSW JCS, 2011 WL 6151506, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2011).

8
9

As the Court previously noted, it is unclear what legal status Vanessa
Accessories is organized as.

Vanessa Accessories alleges in its Answer that

10

“Defendant Jose Rosales is an individual doing business as Vanessa Accessories.”

11

(Answer ¶ 6.)

12

proprietorship.

It therefore appears that Vanessa Accessories is likely a sole

13

The Court once again ORDERS Vanessa Accessories through its representative

14

to file a declaration establishing what type of legal entity it is by Friday, April 18,

15

2014. No hearing will be held. This is Vanessa Accessories’s final warning that

16

failure to timely respond to this Order will result in the Court striking Vanessa

17

Accessories’s Answer for want of licensed counsel.

18

The Court informs Vanessa Accessories that there is a Federal Pro Se Clinic

19

located in the United States Courthouse at 312 N. Spring Street, Room G-19, Main

20

Street Floor, Los Angeles, California 90012. It is open for appointments on Mondays,

21

Wednesdays, and Fridays. A litigant may schedule an appointment by calling (213)

22

385-2977, extension 270.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

March 28, 2014

25
26
27

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28

2