Otter Products LLC et al v. Ace Colors Fashion, Inc et al

Filing 55

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing by Wednesday, July 23, 2014, why it has not moved for entry of default against Electronicos. No hearing will be held; Plaintiff shall respond in writing. The Court will discharge this Order upon a timely application for entry of default filed with the Clerk of Court. Failure to timely respond will result in dismissal of Plaintiffs claims against Electronicos for lack of prosecution. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court Central District of California 9 10 11 12 OTTER PRODUCTS LLC; TREEFROG 13 DEVELOPMENTS, INC. d/b/a 14 LIFEPROOF, Case No. 2:14-cv-00141-ODW(ASx) Plaintiff, 15 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. LACK OF PROSECUTION v. 17 ACE COLORS FASHION, INC.; 18 ELECTRONICOS; SHAYNA’S CELL 19 PHONE ACCESSORIES; VANESSA 20 ACCESSORIES; DOES 1–10, inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 On June 20, 2014, Plaintiff re-served Defendant Electronicos. (ECF No. 53.) 23 Electronicos therefore had until July 11, 2014, to answer or otherwise respond—that 24 is, 21 days after the service date. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i). To date, Electronicos 25 has filed no response. The Court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in 26 writing by Wednesday, July 23, 2014, why it has not moved for entry of default 27 against Electronicos. No hearing will be held; Plaintiff shall respond in writing. The 28 Court will discharge this Order upon a timely application for entry of default filed 1 with the Clerk of Court. 2 Plaintiff’s claims against Electronicos for lack of prosecution. 3 Failure to timely respond will result in dismissal of IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 July 14, 2014 6 7 8 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?