Peter Jehle et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al

Filing 29

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. In accordance with the Court's Memorandum Opinion issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that: (1) the Motion to Dismiss the operative Second Amended Complaint is granted in part; (2) plaintiffs' first claim is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend; (3) plaintiffs' second claim is dismissed without prejudice; and (3) the Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PETER JEHLE, et al.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14

v.

Case No. CV 14-178 JC
JUDGMENT

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

In accordance with the Court’s Memorandum Opinion issued this date,
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that: (1) the Motion to Dismiss the operative
Second Amended Complaint filed by defendants Bank of America, N.A.,
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., ReconTrust Company, N.A., and
The Bank of New York Melon formerly known as The Bank of New York as
Trustee for CWABS Asset-Backed Certificates Trust 2006-15 is granted in part;
(2) plaintiffs’ first claim – a Federal Truth in Lending Act claim arising under
Title 15, United States Code, section 1641(g) – is dismissed with prejudice and
without leave to amend; (3) plaintiffs’ second claim – a California Unfair
Competition Law, California Business and Professions Code section 17200 claim
///

1

– is dismissed without prejudice; and (3) the Doe defendants are dismissed

2

without prejudice.

3

IT IS SO ADJUDGED.

4

DATED: June 10, 2014

5
6
7

______________/s/___________________
Honorable Jacqueline Chooljian
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2