Claudell Hatter v. H. Dyer

Filing 15

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/4/2014. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) (dts)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 14-00616-AG (KK) Title CLAUDELL HATTER V. DYER Present: The Honorable Date July 21, 2014 Kenly Kiya Kato, United States Magistrate Judge Deb Taylor None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute On February 2, 2014, Plaintiff Claudell Hatter, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 11, 2014, the Court issued an Order Re Service of Process (Docket No. 6) ordering, among other things, that "[w]ithin thirty (30) days of this Order, plaintiff shall file with the Court copies of the USM-285 forms he has submitted to the United States Marshal." As of this date, Plaintiff has failed to file the USM-285 forms as required by the March 11, 2014 Order. It therefore appears that plaintiff has failed to follow the Court’s Order. Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, that is, by August 4, 2014, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. Alternatively, Plaintiff can discharge this order by filing copies of the USM-285 forms he submitted to the United States Marshal by August 4, 2014. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to timely file a response to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed by the court as consent to the dismissal of this action without prejudice. CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?