Melody Joy Baker v. Ventura County Human Services Agency

Filing 20

ORDER Denying Plaintiffs Motion to Submit Evidence Pertaining to Various Social Service Agencies and New Evidence for Armory 8 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (lc) .Modified on 4/28/2014 (lc).

Download PDF
1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELODY JOY BAKER, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. VENTURA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, 15 Defendant. 16 ___________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 14-00860 DDP (SHx) Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Submit Evidence Pertaining to Various Social Service Agencies and New Evidence for Armory [Dkt. No. 8] 17 18 Presently before the court is Plaintiff in Pro Per Melody Joy 19 Baker’s Motion to Submit Evidence Pertaining to Various Social 20 Service Agencies and New Evidence for Armory. (DKT No. 8.) The 21 matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. Having 22 considered the parties’ submissions, the court denies the Motion 23 for the following reasons: 24 In the present Motion, Plaintiff seeks the court’s permission 25 to submit evidence that the Ventura Armory is not compliant with 26 the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). However, there is no 27 pending controversy for which the submission of such evidence would 28 be necessary or helpful to resolve. The underlying Complaint 1 alleges that the Oxnard Armory warming shelter facility is not 2 compliant with the ADA, but the Complaint does not allege that the 3 Ventura Armory is non-compliant. (Complaint at 3.) As there is no 4 cause in light of the Complaint for the court to consider evidence 5 related to the Ventura Armory’s compliance with the ADA, the Motion 6 is DENIED. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: April 28, 2014 DEAN D. PREGERSON United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?