Reina Erazo v. Millard Mall Services Inc et al

Filing 9

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The Court finds that MMS has not competently established that this Court has diversity jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, the Court sua sponte REMANDS this case. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. cc: order, docket, remand letter to Los Angeles Superior Court, No. BC 631653. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 remand letter). (lc). Modified on 2/19/2014. (lc).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION SOUTHERN DIVISION 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3535 411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4750 EASTERN DIVISION TERRY NAFISI 3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450 Date 2/19/14 District Court Executive and Clerk of Court LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL FILING UNIT 111 NORTH HILL STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Re: Case Number: 2:14-cv-00893-ODW-SSx Previously Superior Court Case No. BC531653 Case Name: Reina Erazo v. Millard Mall Services Inc et al Dear Sir / Madam: Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on 2/18/14 above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction. , the Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this Court. Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to our office. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Clerk, U. S. District Court By: L Chai Deputy Clerk G Western ✘ 213-894-5730 G Eastern G Southern Division cc: Counsel of record Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein. Clerk, Superior Court By: Date CV - 103 (09/08) Deputy Clerk LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?