Juan Moreno v. Nabil Kheir et al
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT 27 AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 33 . Kheir shall file an answer or, in the alternative, a motion to dismiss, no later than 14 days from the date of this Order by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 7/11/2014 (lc).
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
JUAN MORENO,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 2:14-cv-01000-ODW(RZx)
v.
ORDER GRANTING
NABIL KHEIR and DOES 1–10,
Defendants.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SET
ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT [27]
16
AND DENYING AS MOOT
17
PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR
18
DEFAULT JUDGMENT [33]
19
On June 20, 2014, Defendant Nabil Kheir filed a Motion to Set Aside Entry of
20
Default. (ECF No. 27.) The Clerk of Court entered default against Kheir on June 11,
21
2014. (ECF No. 23.) Kheir is without counsel and is attempting to represent himself
22
in this action. He states that he has been in communication with counsel for Plaintiff
23
Juan Moreno, and that his failure to answer or otherwise defend this action was due to
24
a misunderstanding of civil procedure.
25
discussions with Moreno’s counsel constituted a response to the Complaint. Kheir
26
now asks that entry of default be set aside so that he may properly defend the case.
Specifically, Kheir believed that his
27
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c) gives a district court the discretion to set
28
aside entry of default upon a showing of good cause. In assessing whether good cause
1
exists to set aside default, district courts look at three factors: “(1) whether the
2
plaintiff will be prejudiced, (2) whether the defendant has a meritorious defense, and
3
(3) whether culpable conduct of the defendant led to the default.” Brandt v. Am.
4
Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla., 653 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting Falk v. Allen,
5
739 F.2d 461, 463 (9th Cir. 1984)). Courts must also keep in mind that default
6
judgments are “appropriate only in extreme circumstances” and cases should be
7
decided on the merits whenever possible. Falk, 739 F.2d at 463.
8
The Court finds that good cause exists for setting aside entry of default in this
9
case. Moreno is unlikely to be prejudiced, because this case was filed only a few
10
months ago. Moreover, Moreno has not filed an opposition to the Motion. Kheir
11
indicates that he has a valid defense to Moreno’s claims. This action arises under the
12
Americans with Disabilities Act. Kheir indicates that his business complies with
13
accessibility requirements. Furthermore, while Kheir is culpable for the default, the
14
Court finds Kheir’s actions to be the result of excusable neglect. But Kheir is warned
15
that his decision to represent himself in this action will not excuse him from
16
compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Central District of
17
California’s Local Rules in the future.
18
For these reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry
19
of Default. (ECF No. 27.) Kheir shall file an answer or, in the alternative, a motion to
20
dismiss, no later than 14 days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff Juan Moreno has
21
also filed an Application for Default Judgment. (ECF No. 33.) Since the Court is
22
setting aside the entry of default, the Court DENIES the Application for Default
23
Judgment AS MOOT.
24
Finally, the Court advises Kheir that if he has any doubt concerning law or
25
procedure, or has difficulty filing papers on time, he should consult an attorney. And
26
if he cannot afford an attorney, there is a Federal Pro Se Clinic located in the United
27
States Courthouse at 312 N. Spring Street, Room G-19, Main Street Floor, Los
28
Angeles, California 90012.
The clinic is open for appointments on Mondays,
2
1
Wednesdays, and Fridays starting at 9:30 a.m. The Federal Pro Se Clinic offers free,
2
on-site information and guidance to individuals who are representing themselves in
3
federal civil actions. Kheir is encouraged to visit the clinic for advice concerning his
4
case.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
July 11, 2014
8
9
10
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?