Juan Moreno v. Nabil Kheir et al

Filing 35

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT 27 AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 33 . Kheir shall file an answer or, in the alternative, a motion to dismiss, no later than 14 days from the date of this Order by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 7/11/2014 (lc).

Download PDF
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court Central District of California 8 9 10 11 JUAN MORENO, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 2:14-cv-01000-ODW(RZx) v. ORDER GRANTING NABIL KHEIR and DOES 1–10, Defendants. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT [27] 16 AND DENYING AS MOOT 17 PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR 18 DEFAULT JUDGMENT [33] 19 On June 20, 2014, Defendant Nabil Kheir filed a Motion to Set Aside Entry of 20 Default. (ECF No. 27.) The Clerk of Court entered default against Kheir on June 11, 21 2014. (ECF No. 23.) Kheir is without counsel and is attempting to represent himself 22 in this action. He states that he has been in communication with counsel for Plaintiff 23 Juan Moreno, and that his failure to answer or otherwise defend this action was due to 24 a misunderstanding of civil procedure. 25 discussions with Moreno’s counsel constituted a response to the Complaint. Kheir 26 now asks that entry of default be set aside so that he may properly defend the case. Specifically, Kheir believed that his 27 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c) gives a district court the discretion to set 28 aside entry of default upon a showing of good cause. In assessing whether good cause 1 exists to set aside default, district courts look at three factors: “(1) whether the 2 plaintiff will be prejudiced, (2) whether the defendant has a meritorious defense, and 3 (3) whether culpable conduct of the defendant led to the default.” Brandt v. Am. 4 Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla., 653 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting Falk v. Allen, 5 739 F.2d 461, 463 (9th Cir. 1984)). Courts must also keep in mind that default 6 judgments are “appropriate only in extreme circumstances” and cases should be 7 decided on the merits whenever possible. Falk, 739 F.2d at 463. 8 The Court finds that good cause exists for setting aside entry of default in this 9 case. Moreno is unlikely to be prejudiced, because this case was filed only a few 10 months ago. Moreover, Moreno has not filed an opposition to the Motion. Kheir 11 indicates that he has a valid defense to Moreno’s claims. This action arises under the 12 Americans with Disabilities Act. Kheir indicates that his business complies with 13 accessibility requirements. Furthermore, while Kheir is culpable for the default, the 14 Court finds Kheir’s actions to be the result of excusable neglect. But Kheir is warned 15 that his decision to represent himself in this action will not excuse him from 16 compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Central District of 17 California’s Local Rules in the future. 18 For these reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry 19 of Default. (ECF No. 27.) Kheir shall file an answer or, in the alternative, a motion to 20 dismiss, no later than 14 days from the date of this Order. Plaintiff Juan Moreno has 21 also filed an Application for Default Judgment. (ECF No. 33.) Since the Court is 22 setting aside the entry of default, the Court DENIES the Application for Default 23 Judgment AS MOOT. 24 Finally, the Court advises Kheir that if he has any doubt concerning law or 25 procedure, or has difficulty filing papers on time, he should consult an attorney. And 26 if he cannot afford an attorney, there is a Federal Pro Se Clinic located in the United 27 States Courthouse at 312 N. Spring Street, Room G-19, Main Street Floor, Los 28 Angeles, California 90012. The clinic is open for appointments on Mondays, 2 1 Wednesdays, and Fridays starting at 9:30 a.m. The Federal Pro Se Clinic offers free, 2 on-site information and guidance to individuals who are representing themselves in 3 federal civil actions. Kheir is encouraged to visit the clinic for advice concerning his 4 case. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 July 11, 2014 8 9 10 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?